Date: 22.2.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 670
Ethnographic.professay.info #Thesis statement for building a computer

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Thesis statement for building a computer

Thesis statement for building a computer

Oct/Fri/2017 | Uncategorized








Thesis Statement For Building A …

Thesis statement for building a computer

Write My Research Paper -
Thesis Statement For Building A …

Another ACA Treasury Regulation That Lacks Statutory Authority – Guest Essayist: Grace-Marie Turner. New research about implementation of the Affordable Care Act finds that Obama administration regulations are allowing taxpayer subsidized health insurance for some people earning less than the statutory income floor and also for thesis for building a computer, unlawful immigrants. A new study by bar barbri essay mee review Andy S. Grewal, an associate professor at the University of thesis for building a computer, Iowa College of Law, explains that the ACA provides tax credits to U.S. citizens with incomes between 100 and 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). However, IRS regulations were written to extend credits to university, citizens below 100% FPL in thesis for building, some cases. Also, Section 36B of the ACA grants credits to statement essay, some non-citizens with low-incomes only if they are themselves lawfully present in the U.S. and cannot obtain Medicaid coverage. IRS regulations, however, contradict the statute and allow subsidies if “the taxpayer or a member of the taxpayer’s family is lawfully present in thesis statement for building, the United States,” and “the lawfully present taxpayer or family member is not eligible for the Medicaid program.” The regulations were issued on August 17, 2011, but the how to write discrepancy between the law and the regulations was carefully documented in statement for building, a post by the 5 paragraph pdf Grewal on Bloomberg BNA, “Lurking Challenges to for building, the ACA Tax Credit Regulations.” “A Treasury regulation that extends premium tax credits to messages research paper, individuals whose household incomes fall below the a computer floor established by essay change global warming Section 36B(c)(1)(A) lacks statutory authority,” Grewal concludes. “Another Treasury regulation that extends those credits to thesis for building, some unlawful aliens suffers from a similar infirmity.” He highlights “the pitfalls associated with Treasury’s failure to recognize limits on its administrative authority.” That is the core issue before the how to meta U.S. Supreme Court in King v Burwell where King et al are challenging an IRS rule that allows tax credits to flow through federally-facilitated health insurance exchanges, contrary to the language of the statute which allows the credits only through state exchanges (article originally published May 28, 2015). Only to statement, people earning between 100 and 400 percent of FPL are eligible for premium tax credits under the ACA, but Treasury extended the definition in its 2011 rule to also allow credits for those whose income falls below 100 percent. The 5 Paragraph Essay Pdf? Further, “These taxpayers are generally given larger credits than are given to those who actually meet the statutory criteria,” Grewal writes. And taxpayers who get a larger subsidy than they were due because they mis-estimated their income do not have to repay the money. “The regulation allows a taxpayer to fully keep her tax credits even if, at the close of the taxable year, the taxpayer’s household income did not meet the statutory floor and the taxpayer was not entitled to any credits.” Grewal says it is clear that the regulations contradict the statute , saying, “the statute leaves no room for interpretation,” and thesis statement for building the regulation “contradicts the congressionally prescribed criteria.” This “reflects an impermissible interpretation of the statute,” he writes. Essay Testing? Citizens who submitted comments on the proposed regulations asked Treasury to allow similar flexibility for statement, those earning more than 400 percent of FPL.

Treasury’s answer: No, because that would be “contrary to the language of section 36B.” “In other words,” Grewal writes, “the Treasury thinks that it’s ambiguous whether a taxpayer at the 99 percent level comes within the 100-400 percent statutory range but that a taxpayer at the 401 percent level unambiguously exceeds it.” Grewal’s conclusion: “Nothing in Section 36B allows the Treasury to rewrite the criteria for qualifying as an applicable taxpayer,” including stretching the income eligibility beyond statutory bounds. University Of Chicago? But the illegal regulations don’t end there : “Treasury regulations, however, expand the statement statute and provide tax credits to individuals not lawfully present” in the United States. “Unlike very low-income citizens, whom Congress thought would obtain Medicaid coverage, some low-income lawful aliens may enjoy premium tax credits under Section 36B.” However, a special Treasury rule expanded the definition beyond individual to allow subsidies if a “ taxpayer or a member of the university of chicago 2013 taxpayer’s family is thesis statement lawfully present in the United States,” and mee review “the lawfully present taxpayer or family member is not eligible for the Medicaid program.” The italicized language, not found in the governing statute, allows the lawful status of a family member to a computer, qualify an unlawful alien as an applicable taxpayer. Once again, the statute “does not present an interpretive gap for the Treasury to fill,” Grewal writes. “In precise terms, Congress crafted a special rule that treats an alien whose household income falls outside of the statutory range as an applicable taxpayer only if the a thesis statement alien himself enjoys lawful status, and it specifically denied credits to dependents.” Grewal’s conclusion: “Literally speaking, the regulation allows unlawful aliens to obtain tax credits,” he writes. “Current regulations reflect a desire to implement the ACA as the Treasury thought it should have been drafted, rather than as it was drafted.” The Galen Institute has been cataloguing the major changes made to the ACA. Prof. Grewal’s newly-uncovered finding represents change #50 but is thesis for building a computer #3 on our list because the bar barbri essay testing obscure regulation was issued the year after the law’s passage. It is the for building 31 st change made by how to write meta the administration without statutory authority.

The above was originally published at thesis for building Forbes.com on May 28, 2015. Grace-Marie Turner is how to president of the Galen Institute ( galen.org ), a non-profit research organization focusing on market-based health policy solutions. Click Here to Read More Essays From This Year’s 90 Day Study!

Custom Academic Paper Writing Services -
Developing a Thesis Statement: …

Proposition 8: The Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Recently, I posted a number of posts about California Proposition 8. This is an statement, emotionally charged issue with good thoughts on both sides. Not surprisingly, my posts sparked debate in the comment sections where a number of excellent questions were raised. Richard Hollis is one commentator who raised especially thoughtful questions. As a result of the questions raised, especially by Richard, I have decided to write my thoughts on Same-Sex Marriage from the global warming, ground up and statement for building have asked Richard to respond. Below is my essay followed by Richard’s response. Please note, when I sent Richard my essay, I had not yet added links to my sources. Richard and readers of Evangelical Outpost – thank you for your thoughtful read and consideration of this post. Subliminal Research Paper! – Dustin Steeve. The upcoming proposition amending the constitution in the state of California to affirm marriage gives us opportunity to pause and reflect. Thesis Statement For Building A Computer! Since 1970, marriage has endured a series of devastating attacks. Climate Global Warming! In January 1970 the Family Law Act was signed by for building a computer, California Governor Ronald Reagan and “no-fault divorce” was written into law.

Reagan would later cite this as one of bar barbri essay mee review, his greatest regrets. The intent of the law was to help Californians separate amicably without having to contrive reasons for obtaining a divorce. As the explosive increase in divorces since 1970 attests, the effect of the law was that it hurt marriage. Presently, proposition 8 is giving Californians a rare opportunity to stop further tampering of marriage through law. Thesis Statement For Building A Computer! As we consider the proposition, reason, empirical evidence, and morality ought to inform us. Each of these has led me to the decision to affirm marriage by how to meta, voting yes on proposition 8. Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained.

When I say “fundamental building block of thesis for building, society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of the 5 paragraph pdf, families. Families build societies through the thesis for building a computer, natural birthing and rearing of children. Without children, societies cease to exist. Reason dictates that a society wishing to preserve itself ought to foster and protect the union whereby children are naturally born, supported, and socialized. For marriages where child birth is not possible, married couples have the option to adopt children who do not have the how to write meta, protection and support of their biological parents. Current laws support this natural and healthy system. Allowing same-sex couples to become a normal part of this system is thesis statement a computer unhealthy and essay climate unwise for the following reasons. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is statement no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father.” Psychological evidence shows that children have needs which are met uniquely by subliminal messages, parents of opposite gender. From the way mothers and fathers uniquely hold children, to thesis statement for building a computer, the way they uniquely play with children or discipline children, a child’s need for love, support, and personal well-being are met uniquely by parents of the opposite gender. By definition, same-sex couples cannot meet these unique needs.

Furthermore, no reputable psychological theory or empirical study denies the statement for a comparative, importance of mothers in a child’s development. Statement For Building! Gay men raising children are doing so without a mother in write the nuclear family. Given the evidence, it is false to believe that science shows all family forms to be equal. Thesis Statement A Computer! Out of love for our children and for our fellow citizen, we ought not to how to, solidify this false belief by statement for building, writing into law and teaching it to our children. If we chose to how to write, ignore the number of needs a same-sex couple by definition cannot provide to the state or to the life of children, the a computer, same-sex culture still has elements of great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into marriage. Pain and suffering resulting from sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. Testing! According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of thesis statement for building, a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in 175 for gay men after one homosexual encounter.

These tragic statistics on write, HIV/AIDS seem to statement for building a computer, be confirmed by the Center for Disease Control estimates on HIV prevalence. Multiple differences in lifestyles account for this including the greater likelihood of drug use among gay men as well as a higher average sexual partner rate. Domestic abuse occurs much more frequently within the essay, homosexual community more than within heterosexual relationships. Thesis A Computer! 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. Of Chicago 2013! Gay and bisexual men experience violence at a rate of 2 to 5. In addition to the problems of thesis for building, disease and violence, the subliminal paper, homosexual community has a concept of “commitment” that is very different from marital commitment. Currently, monogamy is the norm and statement for building a computer is socially expected among married couples. Only 25% of heterosexual men and 15% of bar barbri essay, heterosexual women report sexual infidelity; 17% of marriages end in divorce as a result of thesis statement for building, infidelity. Essay! However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of for building, gay men report infidelity in their current relationship.

Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. Apparently, marriage can get worse. I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is unhealthy. Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. However, before I go further in the argument, I want to 2013, be clear on the following point: anyone who suggests you keep your morality out of the marriage question is making a dangerous proposition. Laws are filled with moral presuppositions and prescriptions. Though law and morality are not the same, laws are written by people and every person follows a moral compass. At its core, the decision to thesis a computer, affirm marriage is a moral matter. The decision to allow homosexuals to marry is write meta a moral matter because at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Statement! Your answer to the question of whether homosexuality is moral is going to writing a thesis for a comparative, determine your view of whether homosexual marriage should be accepted.

My moral framework is heavily informed by my evangelical Christian faith. I believe the Lord clearly speaks against statement for building homosexuality through scripture. I recognize that the meta, claim is controversial and worthy of thesis, its own post, but for the sake of brevity, I cite I Corinthians 6: 9-11 as evidence. I believe an appropriate Christian response to homosexuality is one which recognizes that the opposite of homosexuality is bar barbri essay mee review testing not heterosexuality, its holiness. Christians ought to statement a computer, respond to homosexuality as they ought to respond to all other sins: pursuing holiness and lovingly calling others to pursue holiness likewise.

One need not be a Christian in mastering essay order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality. For example, you might be Aristotelian. Thesis Statement! If so, you might consider the anatomical design of essay testing, men and women and conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. Perhaps you believe that there exists a proper order of things as a brute fact of the universe. Certainly, most people believe that there is statement some kind of order to the universe. If you hold the universe to be ordered, then you might look at the 5 essay pdf, the numerous physiological complications resulting from gay sex, such as the need for colostomies, and conclude that the activity is disordered and therefore not good. These are just a few of the many moral frameworks from which arguments against homosexuality can be levied.

Western tradition has always understood marriage and heterosexuality to be normal, healthy, and thesis for building a computer moral. Advocates for homosexual marriage claim that homosexual marriage is equally normal, healthy, and moral. Just as in formal debate the burden of proof rests on those presenting challenge to the status quo, so the statement for a essay, burden of proof rests on the advocates of homosexual marriage to thesis statement, prove its morality. Marriage is a fundamental building block of writing for a comparative, our society. It is foolish to believe altering the form of the marital union will not have consequences. For the reasons stated above, if we allow homosexual marriage, I believe its consequences will be adverse to marriage.

Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of for building a computer, unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to of chicago essay prompts, that trend. A Computer! I hope that you will apply reason to an examination of the evidence, that you will allow your moral framework to play a role in your decision. I believe that I have done so and have come to the 5, the conclusion that it is my responsibility, morally and for reasons pertaining to the health of my society, to vote yes on a computer, proposition 8 and bar barbri essay mee review affirm marriage. by Dustin Steeve. Your essay begins by statement for building a computer, talking about the ‘devastating attacks’ that have been waged against marriage since 1970, citing no-fault divorce as an example. The impression it seems to convey is essay warming that marriage is a sacred institution that has stood immovable and implacable for statement for building, eons, but now recently faces threat. Essay Warming! This is something of a fallacy. The Bible itself (a popular reference point for those who traditionally oppose same-sex marriage) shows us that different attitudes to marriage have been in vogue in different times.

The Israelite patriarch Jacob, for example, married both Rachel and Leah, daughters of Laban. “And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.” –Genesis 29:28. Jacob ended up with four wives, and was far from the only polygamist in the Bible. Others include Gideon (Judges 8:30), Elkanah, father of the statement, prophet Samuel (1 Samuel 1:2), and kings such as Abijah (2 Chronicles 13:21), Rehoboam (2 Chronicles 11:21), and Jehoiada (2 Chronicles 24:3). Most famously, Solomon himself had “seven hundred wives… and three hundred concubines” (2 Kings 11:3). Bar Barbri Testing! None of thesis statement a computer, these royal polygamists were chastised or punished by God for this – except for Solomon, but even here the exception proves the rule. According to the Bible, Solomon’s sin was not that he married many wives, but that he married foreign wives who turned him away from climate warming, worshipping Yahweh (11:4). Of course, these were times when women were considered merely property, and the New Testament moves much closer to our traditional ‘one-man-one-woman’ view of thesis statement for building, marriage (though it never actually condemns the polygamists of the Old Testament). But it does show that the concept of bar barbri essay testing, marriage has changed, and is culturally specific, rather than an institution with clear rules handed down by God and statement thriving unchanged throughout human history since Creation.

For an example closer to our time, consider interracial marriage. Of Chicago Essay! In 1967, Mildred Loving and her husband Richard, an interracial couple, were arrested at their Virginia home for violating that state’s anti-miscegenation law. The couple pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to thesis, a year in prison. The appeal went all the way up to write meta, the Supreme Court, which lead to an end to bans on interracial marriage. Today the fight to end the ban on thesis for building a computer, same-sex marriage mirrors the one to end the ban on interracial marriage. Gay couples, just like mixed race couples, seek exactly the meta, same thing: to be allowed to marry the ones they love. It is a parallel which many supporters of the ban find uncomfortable, since racism these days is so widely regarded as bigoted and unacceptable. Homophobia, unfortunately, is less so. Next, you claim that children “have needs which are met uniquely by parents of opposite gender.” I am sorry that, being a draft essay, there is no link for me to follow, but let me cite the statement a computer, following for examples of many, many studies which show insignificant or no detrimental affects on children having been raised by how to write meta, same-sex couples. Thesis Statement For Building! If the mastering paragraph pdf, sources you cite turn out to be valid, we can only conclude that the for building, results from research and research studies are, at best, mixed.

It is also worth considering the sort of people that society does allow to marry and procreate. Murders, convicted felons, even child molesters are still free to wed and have children. They do not lose these rights through their actions. In the eyes of the law, they are still considered capable of loving another person and their own children, while homosexuals are not. This should be obviously ridiculous to anyone who has ever met a single homosexual. They are just as capable of loving another person, and a child, as heterosexuals.

But that is rather beside the a computer, point, because when discussing whether a same-sex marriage is a healthy environment in which to raise a child, you are really talking about gay adoption and parenting. This is an entirely new argument (though one in which I’d be happy to participate). Even if it were shown that a same-sex household was not a suitable environment in which to raise a child (and I am not agreeing with that statement at all), then that would still not be have any relevance on whether we should allow gay people the essay change global, right to be joined in matrimony to their partner. Unlike the thesis for building a computer, case of how to, interracial marriage where children are generally an for building, inevitable consequence of marriage, for same-sex couples they obviously are not. You then go on to quote shocking statistics about homosexual relationships.

I have to mastering essay, be honest, but when I read them I laughed. This is exactly the kind of homophobic nonsense which simply does not stand up to real-world experience of homosexuals. “78% of lesbian relationships are riddled with domestic abuse… Only 25% of heterosexual men and 15% of heterosexual women report sexual infidelity… 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship.” Again, I only wish I had the links available to me to read up on thesis a computer, these studies, but as it is of chicago essay prompts 2013 I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. The implications are clear: homosexuals are dirty and diseased, totally unable to control their lusts and their relationships are all dysfunctional. In actual fact, you only need to thesis a computer, spend a little time on the gay scene to realise that homosexuals are people, just like heterosexuals. How To Write! Relationships are just as complicated and statement for building a computer complex as they are for heterosexuals. Perhaps homosexuals are a little more inclined to mastering paragraph essay pdf, promiscuity (though I find the statement a computer, statistics you quote grossly exaggerated), but -and this is the point- you still find love between homosexuals. Plutonic love, fraternal love, but also deep, caring, romantic love. And the fact is that these couples cannot marry. Same-sex marriage has been legal in several countries for years, so we can, to a limited degree, measure the effects of same-sex marriage. Denmark, for example, legalised it in 1989. The results from this ‘long-running experiment’ have been uniformly positive.

Opposition to the Danish law was led by the clergy (much the same as in the States). Subliminal Messages! A survey conducted at the time revealed that 72 percent of Danish clergy were opposed to the law. For Building! It was passed anyway, and the change in the attitude of the essay mee review testing, clergy there has been dramatic – a survey conducted in thesis for building 1995 indicated that 89 percent of the Danish clergy now admit that the law is a good one and has had many beneficial effects, including a reduction in suicide, a reduction in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and in promiscuity and infidelity among gays. But again, this rather misses the point. If you are worried that same-sex couples seem promiscuous, then your real quarrel is university of chicago essay with promiscuity, not same-sex couples. If you believe that same-sex couples are violent, then your real quarrel is with violence, not same-sex couples. If you believe that sexually transmitted diseases are more common among same-sex couples, then your problem is with sexually transmitted diseases, not same-sex couples. To refuse marriage to all same-sex couples on these grounds is simply to be a bigot and thesis a computer tar all homosexuals with the same brush. You then go on write, to talk about laws being rooted in morality. This I do agree with. Statement A Computer! Laws are entirely human constructs, and we make and bar barbri essay mee review revise them as we see fit.

We do look to our own moral compasses to guide us in deciding what activities should be criminalised in our societies, and statement for building which should not. However, you then state that your own morality is rooted in your religion, and that you object to statement essay, homosexuality itself for religious reasons. This, of course, is your choice. You may base your beliefs on a computer, whatever you wish, and I don’t doubt that religion is a popular choice for many people. But when your religious beliefs lead you to actively support a ban which has deep and fundamental consequences on other people, you are effectively enforcing your own religious beliefs onto other people.

You correctly state that one does not need to be a Christian to writing a thesis statement comparative, oppose gay marriage, but that does not mean that everyone does, by a long, long way. Many homosexuals may belong to any number of religions who are neutral to the matter or homosexuality. Many sects of Buddhism, for example, celebrate homosexual relationships. Statement A Computer! In reality it is their religious freedom which is being infringed. The state should not be trying to enforce a religion on its citizens, which is essentially what is a thesis statement for a essay happening if same-sex couples are forbidden to thesis statement for building a computer, marry for religious reasons. Anyone who believes in genuine religious freedom cannot oppose same-sex marriage on the basis of subliminal paper, their own personal religious beliefs. “Just as in formal debate the burden of proof rests on those presenting challenge to the status quo, so the thesis for building, burden of proof rests on the advocates of essay testing, homosexual marriage to prove its morality.” This, I am afraid is thesis statement a computer simply not true. The burden of proof is not on anyone challenging the status quo. Such beliefs helped to essay change global warming, keep slavery and racial segregation alive for years. To quote from Wikipedia: “Under the thesis a computer, Latin maxim necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the subliminal, ordinary rule is that “the necessity of proof lies with he who complains.” For example, a person has to thesis for building, prove that someone is guilty (in a criminal case) or liable (in a civil case) depending on the allegations; a person is prompts 2013 not required to prove his or her own innocence, it is thesis statement rebuttably presumed.” In the case of homosexuality, the burden is on ‘they who complain’, i.e., the people who object to it.

Just as we should assume arrested men are innocent until shown guilty. Paragraph Essay Pdf! We should also assume homosexuality is morally ‘innocent’ until shown otherwise. Thesis For Building A Computer! The problem with your position is that you start with a prejudice (that homosexuality is wrong), and then challenge people to mee review testing, convince you otherwise. This is back to front. Can you see the problem if I stated that I think all black people are immoral and thesis statement for building a computer then challenged people to prove me wrong (just to be clear, I don’t actually think that)? To conclude, allowing same-sex couples to marry will not bring about the bar barbri essay testing, destruction of marriage, families and statement a computer society in general. All homosexuals are asking for is the right to of chicago essay prompts 2013, be united with their loved ones, and to thesis for building a computer, have that union recognised for what it is: in how to every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and thesis a computer worthy of respect as those undertaken by university essay prompts 2013, heterosexuals. By what right do we deny them this? By Richard Hollis. Dustin Steeve is a blogger and web enthusiast.

Dustin's passion is to see his generation of thesis for building, Christians rise up as thought leaders, doing remarkable, good work Christianly. Dustin is interested in the rise of web media and increasingly prominent use of research paper, computer technology as a tool to aid people. Statement A Computer! Dustin worked for three years as the director of GodblogCon and is an adviser for the Christian Web Conference. Dustin graduated summa cum laude and received his B.A. in History from Biola University where he also graduated from Torrey Honors Institute. Dustin has completed some post-graduate work at the Stanford Graduate School of Business where he was appointed to university essay prompts 2013, the Dean's List and thesis for building received a certificate of climate global, completion from the Summer Institute for for building a computer, General Management. View all posts by Dustin R. Steeve.

You state that “at the core of essay mee review testing, homosexual marriage is homosexuality…[and] whether homosexuality is moral” If this is thesis for building a computer really the mastering pdf, core issue, then why all the thesis statement a computer, subterfuge over marriage? Why not criminalize homosexuality? For if you cannot justify criminalizing homosexuality, its seems to me that you cannot make a good argument against banning gay marriage. If you respond that you do want to criminalize homosexuality too (I mean literally fine, jail, or deport gay people), then it seems somewhat deceitful that you haven’t explicitly made that policy argument. It prompts questions about a “secret agenda” or “slippery slope”….will you next criminalize divorce next, taking the Lord’s name in vane, dancing, or alcohol? We are all sinners. After the warming, “pure Christians” finish with the gays, will they come for me next? Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an for building a computer, average of paragraph essay, 3-5 partners a year.

If you are morally opposed to the idea of gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? “. Statement For Building! . . the opposite of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, its holiness.” So what’s the opposite of heterosexuality? And again, if “the core of writing a thesis, homosexual marriage is homosexuality,” what is at “the core” of heterosexual marriage? If you are morally opposed to thesis a computer, the idea of gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Are saying gays need to be bribed to be monogamous? Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? You’ve got to write meta, get goodies from the state? Sounds like gays have a lot of problems to work out before they start demanding marriage.

First, I think that fully legal and supported Civil Unions should be the level of acceptance supported by the legal system — I read (and lightly believe) that there are some 27 different legal rights of a spouse from marriage that, in theory, could be gained by specific contractual agreements. I’d actually like to see a full booklet summarizing all of them, but haven’t (perhaps you know?). Marriage is for children. In a very real, genetic based way, every child is a marriage of thesis statement for building a computer, half of messages paper, each parent’s DNA — the mother’s ovum DNA is married to the father’s sperm DNA. (a bond no one can sunder.) How many gov’t benefits / lower taxes or credits, etc., should be granted to parents is one of the particular issues somewhat outside of ‘gay marriage’. I think the non-gov’t benefits of marriage are so great that no additional benefits are needed, until very expensive children are born — and it is in the raising of children that gov’t cash benefits should be focused. All homosexuals are asking for is the right to statement for building a computer, be united with their loved ones, and to subliminal research, have that union recognised for what it is: in thesis for building every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and worthy of respect as those undertaken by paper, heterosexuals. Thesis A Computer! By what right do we deny them this? Because promiscuity is immoral, and there’s a much higher probability of promiscuity among gays than among married straights, I don’t consider them ‘equal’. Drunk driving is a better comparison than inter-racial marriage.

Most drunk drivers most of the time get home as safely as sober drivers — and many sober folk have accidents. Yet drunk driving is illegal because of the probability of more accidents. I don’t consider any unmarried lovers as ‘respect worthy’ as married lovers, because of the a thesis for a, commitment to fidelity promise; gays asking for marriage are not even uniform in agreement on whether fidelity should be part of their marriage agreement. Marriage has already been weakened, and thesis statement for building devalued (a la Britney, Liz Taylor, etc.); and even love itself has been primarily portrayed in culture as lust, rather than commitment. Gay marriage rather than civil unions weakens it further. Finally, homosexual behavior is sinful in Christian theology. University Of Chicago Essay! Part of the statement, gay marriage push to ‘equal morality’ is to make it illegal to claim that gay sex is sinful. (See Europe) I’m a sinner, too. But even so, I object to steps towards restricting Christians from calling gay sex sinful — and thus immoral. Straight promiscuity is also immoral; and neither should be respected as equal to married faithfulness.

Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained. When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of families. Agreed but I think you would then also agree that it is all the more important not to exclude members of society from marriage unless there is a very good reason. In addition, you miss the trees from the forest.

A family is not just a baby or child but many people. Marriage, when it works well, provides for 2013, stability for all family members. This is thesis good for a baby but it is also good for everyone else, such as the elderly or even the single person who is alone. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and mastering paragraph essay father.” OK but what does this have to statement for building a computer, do with gay marriage? By definition the only way for a gay couple to be raising a kid is if this above ideal has broken down somehow. According to essay warming, ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in for building 165,000 as opposed to 1 in climate global 175 for for building a computer, gay men after one homosexual encounter. That’s a good point in favor for gay marriage, as for the other statistics:

I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is unhealthy. Bar Barbri Essay! Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. Not really, you’ve written off a class of human beigns based on a sociological study. Give me an Excel sheet with enough data and I’ll find you plenty of for building a computer, niches among heterosexuals that replicate the essay change warming, ‘problems’ you’ve shown. For example, if I demonstrated that marriages of 35+ yr old women to men between 19-24 have incidents of cheating and STDs equal or greater than the ones you cited for gays would you prohibit the recognition of such marriages? How many other members of your cohort would it take to thesis statement for building a computer, screw up marriage so much that you’d give up your wife?

People who cite studies are of more dubious moral character than any homosexual my friend, don’t be a sociologist! Tread very carefully! The decision to allow homosexuals to marry is a moral matter because at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Your answer to the question of whether homosexuality is moral is going to determine your view of writing a thesis comparative, whether homosexual marriage should be accepted. My moral framework is heavily informed by my evangelical Christian faith. 1. Not all people are Christians and not even all Christians agree with you on gay marriage. 2. For Building A Computer! The purpose of the state is not to enshrine Christian morality and it isn’t to ‘teach’ morality. This is why many marriages are perfectly legal even though they would ideally be given at least a little skeptical scrutiny by a pastor….more about that below… Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to subliminal messages research paper, that trend. Why don’t you show us how keeping the gay couple down the statement, street from being able to have a legal marriage stops you from being a good father to your children or a good husband to research paper, your wife…or at thesis for building, least would facilitate you becoming a better one?

If you can’t do that then why not ‘put a stop to that trend’ by, say, actually putting a stop to writing a thesis comparative essay, the trend and thesis for building put your eggs in rewriting divorce laws. A cynic might say here you are rallying the troops behind feeling good by attacking a minority group you people do not like, do not associate with and would like to write, scapegoat for your own miserable failings. As a matter of fact, why not go only as far as the thesis for building a computer, Catholic Church and refuse to recognize divorced people who have remarried except under circumstances where an application for annullment has been vetted and granted? Why not castigate the failure of your VP candidate to properly raise her daughter and stop celebrating the impending marriage that…study wise….is likely to be yet another failed marriage? Timber in thine own eye indeed. Are saying gays need to be bribed to be monogamous? Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? Please stop trying to the 5 paragraph pdf, outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the campionship. On the off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is thesis for building a computer a ‘bribe’ to be monogamous but more of a challenge that has both positive and negative reinforcement. University Essay Prompts 2013! Even with no-fault divorce and adultry no longer being a major cause for ‘punishment’ in divorce hearings you’re playing with fire if you get married without an intention to statement a computer, at least try to change warming, be monogamous. Your partner can screw you over (pardon the pun) in statement for building lots of change global, ways both legal and emotional. (For an thesis statement a computer, interesting take on how marriage has a dark side that can, in some ways, be good see the response this advice columnist gave here:http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2008/08/22/laughter_in_the_dark/ really read it, it was one of the most interesting takes I’ve ever read although it’s not directly tied to gay marriage at prompts, all)

Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? NOTE: All the moms and for building a computer dads with teen kids thinking of moving in with their girlfriends or boyfriends might want to take note of this phrase from ucfengr. Take the messages paper, internet filter off the p orn #038; block out for building ucfengr’s writing least you want some of statement, his words thrown at you! Please stop trying to outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the campionship. Perhaps you should get over yourself, Boonton. You’re really not smart enough to thesis, call other people stupid so freely. On the off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is a ‘bribe. That’s great, but you weren’t the one I was responding to. I was responding to testing, this: why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to stay monogamous, even before they are married. For most the knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is not enough for gays, who need a government bribe.

Richard Hollis wrote: Again, I only statement, wish I had the links available to me to subliminal messages research, read up on these studies, but as it is I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. I’m not sure I understand this objection, since there were ample links to the statistic sources and the studies to which Dustin referred. Perhaps you object to the fact that some of these sources are not downloadable for free? Or is it that they are hosted on sites like Family Research Council (www.frc.org) to which you do not wish to contribute?

Or (as I believe is more likely) do you simply choose to disbelieve those studies that do not fit your world view? Don’t misunderstand me: I frankly think Prop 8 is the wrong solution to the “problem”, if “gay marriage” is a problem. I would rather that government, at all levels, have nothing to say at all about marriage. That which government controls will likely be controlled in statement a computer a manner I do not approve. Marriage is essay pdf a great example of this principle. Statement! I believe it to be a sacred covenant, which should be sanctioned by the church and mee review testing society, and entered (or dissolved) by the free choice of individuals. As such, the a computer, coercive power of government at any level is not only unnecessary, it distorts the societal benefit and religious meaning of the paper, relationship. Thesis Statement! Government’s role, if it has any at all, should be limited to enforcing the terms of the contract. Would such a laissez-faire approach allow same-sex couples to get “married”?

Of course. Would such couples get the benefits accorded to “traditional” marriages? No more or less than they do now; such benefits are under the control of the institution doing the providing, whether a charity, employer, or government. As an example, anti-Prop 8 groups cite the problem that a same-sex partner would not inherit pensions. The truth is, pensions are not inheritable, unless it is stipulated in the contract(s) that create the pension . And, in fact, many — not all, but many — pension plans are inheritable by anyone the pension recipien;t wishes, whether spouse, partner, progeny, or next-door neighbor. Messages Research! That some, and statement for building maybe most pensions are not so designable is not a problem with the law, it is a problem with the contract signed to create the pension. The heritability of some government benefits is a whole ‘nother subject, but this, too, could be solved simply by how to meta, removing the concept of “marriage” from the law altogether.

All of this said, I will probably vote in favor of Proposition 8. Statement For Building A Computer! If we can’t get government out of the marriage business altogether, we can at mee review, least get them to define it in a manner that most Californians can stomach. Perhaps you should get over a computer, yourself, Boonton. Bar Barbri Testing! You’re really not smart enough to for building, call other people stupid so freely. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an elite force here….

Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to messages research, stay monogamous, even before they are married. … Like I said I think it is thesis statement a computer missing something to describe marriage as an ‘incentive for monogamoy’. Essay! It is more accurate to describe it as a challenge (in lots of things, not just monogamy). Statement For Building! A challenge has positives but it also has difficulties. For most the knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is not enough for gays, who need a government bribe. You don’t get a gov’t bribe for being monogamous in essay climate change a marriage. Did I miss something, is California giving out coupons for for building, free ice cream for married gay couples who don’t cheat? And I notice you dodged my other point, if the only point here is the fuzzy happy thought of a relationship why have marriage at all? Why don’t people just live with each other as they please and if that turns out to be a life long relationship great if not ahhh well? Your view of marriage seems to not only make it unneeded for the 5, gays but for statement for building a computer, everyone.

Channelling a bit of Hugh Hefner today are we? I agree wholeheartedly with you that getting government altogether out of chicago essay of the issue is the preferable course (as I argued in the thread on the former post on the subject). Christians err when they want representative government to make it safe to a computer, believe in messages Christianity. The only danger that concerns me as an American is the loss of freedom of thesis for building a computer, speech under hate crime regimens. JustMakingItUp: Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually I meant that I literally couldn’t follow the how to meta, links, as I had only received a draft version of Dustin’s original essay by thesis a computer, e-mail, and the links were not attached. To be fair, I do take your point that it was the how to write meta, weakest part of my response because I was speaking from an statement for building, emotional point rather than a logical one. My hunch was to reject these statistics out of hand because they seemed so over-inflated, and this of course, would not have been a reasonable thing to do if I could have followed the links.

However, I still think my hunch was justified. Statistics like this (when people are presumably interviewed and asked to simply tell the university of chicago essay prompts 2013, truth) are generally notoriously difficult for a number of reasons. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researcher has discovered a tendancy in gay men to thesis a computer, exaggerate their sexual conquests. It may be that the research involved heterosexual people who were still in relationships (and therefore more likely to lie about their infidelities). Subliminal Messages! It may even be that the researchers were not impartial, and actively wanted to find that gay men were promiscuous, and so deliberately asked heterosexual people who seemed straight-laced and statement a computer monogamous, and homosexual people who seemed rather… well… sluttish (for want of a better word). A lot of work needs to go into making sure legitimate scientific studies are impartial, objective, and wherever possible, double-blinded. And that is before you even study the how to write, implications of the findings.

But yes, now I can access the links, I intend to read up on these studies (I still have not done so yet). Thesis For Building! It should make interesting reading. In theory I’m not against your libertarian take on marriage but I’m not sure it is as practical as you depict to simply replace all of it with a bunch of subliminal messages, contracts. For example, some states still have spousal privilege when it comes to criminal trials, I don’t see how you can replicate that in a private contract. Even if you’re willing to dispense with privilege, there are other legal implications to getting married that are bit complicated. For example, you are legally obligated for the debts your spouse incurs for necessities like medical care. This obviously has a public policy benefit….Donald Trump’s wife can’t ask for charity care on the grounds that she has no job and statement her husband doesn’t want to foot the bill but I don’t think you could manufacture it by having your spouse carry around a private contract. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the global warming, reason I was not able to access the link is that I had only received a draft of Dustin’s post via e-mail and for building a computer the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response. I was taking an mastering paragraph, emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and for building a computer this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to essay climate change, access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to thesis statement, fill out bar barbri mee review testing surveys and trusted to tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to for building, exaggerate their sexual conquests. Perhaps the heterosexuals interviewed were in relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to any infidelities. Perhaps the researchers themselves were biased, and subliminal messages actively wanted to prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to thesis statement, give the results they wanted to hear. It is extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and even accurate. And that is before we even discuss the bar barbri testing, implications of the findings.

But now I have the links, I intend to follow them (I still have not done so yet). I’m sure they will make interesting reading. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the reason I was not able to statement for building, access the link is that I had only received a draft of how to meta, Dustin’s post via e-mail and the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response. I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to fill out surveys and statement a computer trusted to how to write, tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to exaggerate their sexual conquests. Thesis Statement! Perhaps the heterosexuals interviewed were in relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to any infidelities. Perhaps the mastering essay, researchers themselves were biased, and thesis a computer actively wanted to prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to give the results they wanted to hear.

It is extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and even accurate. And that is before we even discuss the implications of the of chicago essay prompts 2013, findings. But now I have the links, I intend to follow them (I still have not done so yet). I’m sure they will make interesting reading. Ooops. Statement! Sorry about that… I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response.

I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one. Write! I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to a computer, access the write meta, links. The studies probably are overinflated, outdated and distorted in some or many respects but the larger issue is ‘so what’. Statistics are always in flux and it is always possible to create the numbers that suit your agenda, and by thesis statement a computer, create I don’t mean lie but simply choose your subjects carefully to get the results you want. Research! How about the for building, divorce rate for A-level celebrities who marry within two years of their first cover on subliminal, People magazine? Domestic abuse rates for couples that meet at AA or NA meetings perhaps? If I told you bloggers have a 97% failure rate at marriage how would you feel about the state telling you it’s not going to let you get married for thesis, the sake of the ‘institution’? Great post!!

I invite everyone to read the post on http://editorialsection.com. I haven’t visited Evangelical Outpost for quite a while. Now that I return it feels like Charlton Heston returning to earth in Planet of the Apes. Is this some kind of Emergent Evangelicalism? From these comments, and those on other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of the 5 pdf, marriage and the family – beginning with gender, moving on I presume to number. A large number seem poised to support a candidate most distinguished for his promise to sweep away even the smallest impediments to the killing of unborn children as one of his first acts in office. Freedom of the Gospel, indeed.

This kind of freedom appears set to bind our nation for a very long time. (Note: BitterClinger is thesis statement for building merely a screenname, not intended to imply any relationship to Jamie Farr, his family or associates.) I think both authors have thoughtfully expressed their opinions, and I applaud their efforts. This is the change global warming, kind of reasoned discourse that, while it might not lead to consensus, keeps open the doors of communication. Thank you, Mr.

Steeve and Mr. Hollis for your contributions. You have given me much to ponder. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an a computer, elite force here…. As I said, you are not smart enough to call anybody stupid. Perhaps you should stop trying to justify it. Like I said I think it is missing something to describe marriage as an writing statement for a, ‘incentive for monogamoy’. Then talk to thesis statement for building a computer, Ebonmuse, he was the one that asserted it was needed. Essay Mee Review Testing! Though, he is far from the only “gay marriage” advocate to use that argument. What is sad is that people use Christianity when it is convenient for them.

The verses most Christians use against homosexuality, if looked at closer, condemn those that would use them. If you do follow the Bible, Homosexuality is a sin. Guess what so is Adultery! We don’t have a problem with our kids seeing a man and thesis woman sin on TV but two men or two women and God’s gonna burn your TV! You can’t convince someone to desire to be Holy unless you can demonstrate what Holy is. It’s Planks and mastering the 5 essay Splinters. Thesis! No I don’t agree with homosexuality but I’m tired of people living with their girlfriend out of wedlock and Telling a Gay couple they will burn in Hell. Then talk to Ebonmuse, he was the essay testing, one that asserted it was needed. Though, he is far from the thesis for building a computer, only “gay marriage” advocate to use that argument. If you want to conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on a comment board is university 2013 fair game for criticism by statement for building a computer, anyone who reads it. From these comments, and those on writing a thesis for a essay, other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of marriage and statement a computer the family – beginning with gender, moving on university prompts 2013, I presume to number.

Nah, the comments you see that support the redefinition of marriage and statement for building a computer family are the atheists, Cafeteria Christians, and others that nay-say evangelicals and purport to tell everybody they aren’t tolerant enough (never mind the fact that Christ didn’t tolerate sin). The comments made by others tend to get lost in the shuffle or drown out by of chicago prompts, the comments from the self-appointed arbiters of intelligence, tolerance, and enlightenment. If you want to conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on a comment board is fair game for criticism by statement, anyone who reads it. What’s amazing about this whole discourse, is that Boonton calls me stupid. Testing! Here’s the path: Ebonmuse asserts that gays need the for building, incentive of marriage to practice monogamy. I point out how silly that is and if it’s true (which it could be, he is not the only gay marriage supporter to put forward that argument), gays obviously have bigger problems than not being able to be married. Boonton calls me stupid for prompts 2013, saying gays need an incentive to be monogamous, while at statement for building a computer, the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an incentive is a thesis statement for a comparative (here’s a clue, marriage is the incentive). Now that I look at statement, it, I find myself starting to agree with Boonton; I am stupid.

Who but an essay prompts 2013, idiot would get stuck in orbit around the thesis a computer, black hole of stupidity that is Boonton? It doesn’t look as if the original author of this post intends to the 5 paragraph essay pdf, address my point. Unfortunate. ucfengr, you have twisted my words. I did not say that gays “need the incentive of marriage to practice monogamy”. That is thesis statement obviously false: the subliminal paper, large numbers of gay couples who are already living in statement a computer monogamous relationships, fighting for the right to have those relationships legally recognized, is disproof enough of statement for a comparative, that. But if you think monogamy is a good thing, as I assume you do, then why would you be opposed to giving people additional incentives to practice it? If you’re opposed to “bribing” people to be monogamous, do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? The selective application of logic when it comes to anti-gay-marriage arguments never ceases to astonish. Are some gays promiscuous? No doubt.

And something like 50% of heterosexual marriages end in statement for building divorce. Paper! Does that also prove that straight people are inherently promiscuous and statement for building don’t deserve access to marriage either? do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? Most of those tax incentives or exemptions occur for dependent children. If the couple both work and earn extra money, their taxes can often be higher when their combined income pushes them into paper the higher tax bracket. Given how advocates brag about statement a computer how homosexuals tend to earn more, that seems more likely to climate warming, happen than not. One other thing to note is that depending on how much a parent spends on their child, that tax exemption does not really make a child any more affordable and only slightly mitigates the expenses of raising children. So loosing the tax exemptions and a computer other supposed benefits given to heterosexual married couples would be worth it to me at writing statement for a essay, least if it were to be traded for the elimination of monosexed marriage being recognized as valid by the government. Do you think that the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit seeking governmental recognition of their relationship as a valid marriage if the tax exemptions and other benefits were non-existent for heterosexual marriages?

I for one, do not think they would quit. I think bringing those things up is used as an evasion from having to talk about the thesis a computer, true and underlying motives behind the activism. I’m pretty educated in religion and theology (masters degrees in both). i lean pretty heavily on the conservative side when it comes to issues of the 5 pdf, homosexuality, bottom line, i disagree with it and thesis don’t think it’s right or moral. Mastering The 5 Paragraph Pdf! With that said i would still not vote for proposition 8. I think the homosexual community should have the statement, right to marriage and meta things that go with marriage. Statement A Computer! I also don’t agree with the Muslim faith and many other faiths and practices but i still think Islamic people should have the mastering, right to get married.

I think it’s a smoke screen to think that the liberal illuminati are going to statement a computer, take over the country and gays are going to be the down fall of university, marriage. I simply don’t believe that to thesis for building, be true. People, specifically people who claim to follow Jesus need to how to write, get serious about statement marriage before they start wanting to defend it in essay mee review testing court. McCain being a huge example. This is America we believe in for building freedom of religion and equal right, i affirm those things and it’s it’s because of that that i think homosexuals should be able to marry. I really don’t see how someone well versed in religion and theology can counter Jesus’ definition of marriage – one man and of chicago essay one woman.

To do so implies that you find suspect at least one of his teachings. The question then becomes – How many more after that do you find suspect such that you can no longer say you whole-heartedly believe what Jesus taught? Boonton calls me stupid for saying gays need an thesis, incentive to be monogamous, while at the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an university of chicago essay, incentive is (here’s a clue, marriage is the incentive). It’s stupid to describe marriage as a bribe by the gov’t to be monogamous. Marriage does indeed have incentives to be monogamous but it’s a lot more complicated than that.

It is a challenge to reap the rewards of mutual monogamy….the description of a marriage as a contract is very apt. In a contract, both parties agree to give something up in exchange for something else. Thesis For Building A Computer! It is assumed they enter a contract because they deem this to be a fair trade. Yes it is possible for one side to messages research paper, cheat (example, you accept the inventory but refuse to pay the vendor) so contract law has incentives for both sides not to thesis for building a computer, cheat. The point of that, though, is not for the gov’t to bribe people into honoring their contracts. Smmtheory – hello again. I just had to prompts 2013, post to correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about statement homosexuality at all. Nothing. Not one thing. Which is odd in itself; if homosexuality is of chicago essay 2013 such a great sin, you’d think he’d at statement for building, least MENTION it once…

To the people who say ‘No’ on prop 8. How about changing the definition of marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it? How about subliminal research paper redefining of “dependent” in tax law by thesis statement for building a computer, changing it and adoption of a dog can be allowed for research paper, tax exemption for statement a computer, dependent? Can you accept it?

Let’s keep the common sense. Request for Same sex marriage has gone much higher beyond tolerance level of messages paper, our society. Therfore, ‘YES’ on Prop 8 is statement for building absolutely necessary for meta, our social health. Jeong, that is a ridiculous comparrison. Statement! A marriage is a union of research, two consenting equals.

You cannot marrying a dog because a dog has no idea what it is doing. Thesis! It does not understand marriage, let alone consent to it. Therefore it is not a fair comparrison. Two men or two women can love each other as deeply and sincerely as a man and a woman. Requesting same-sex marriage does not go beyond tolerance at all. How about changing the definition of marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it?

Not really, I see no argument in favor of man-dog or woman-pig marriages. Comparative! I see a very good one against it which is that dogs and pigs are not humans. Last time I checked, gays are. How about redefining of “dependent” in tax law by statement a computer, changing it and how to write adoption of a dog can be allowed for tax exemption for dependent? Can you accept it? Well anyone can be a dependent in tax law….if you are taking care of someone, I think the test is provide at least half their expenses and that is thesis statement a computer more than $5K a year…..as for expanding that to dogs, I’d love that as I have two dogs….but I suppose it would be wiser to use a tax exemption to help someone keep their home or cloth their kids. Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Homosexuality, anybody might be able to redefine it according to their preference without restriciton. In that case, this society will be in mess to define what is right or wrong and what can be tolerant or banned. Without certain restriction of human freedom according to common social welfare, evetually this society will be uncontrolable and return to very primitive society.

If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is not acceptable just because dog is not humanbeing, it is completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of ‘NO’ side of prop 8. If you think there is of chicago prompts no problem to choose your partner for marriage with same sex, why does it become problem for statement for building, a person to how to write, choose a dog as marriage partner. You have to thesis for building, keep in mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is university of chicago essay prompts 2013 innate. Let’s have common sense and logic… The same sex marriage should not be tolerated in the health society. ‘YES’ on statement a computer, Prop 8…it should be for you and me and my children and future generation and all human being. I just had to paragraph pdf, post to correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality at all. Nothing.

Not one thing. Which is a computer odd in itself; if homosexuality is such a great sin, you’d think he’d at least MENTION it once… Well, let’s put it this way, homosexual sex is sex outside of marriage, which Jesus did have something to say about. Mastering The 5 Pdf! And since his definition of marriage was between one man and one woman, I think that kind of means that when Jesus thinks sex outside of thesis a computer, marriage is sinful, that includes homosexual type. And for essay climate warming, those who thought that was unfair, Jesus recommended celibacy. Homosexual activity doesn’t exactly qualify as celibacy either. So there you have it, Jesus’ teaching on sex – either to your opposite thesis statement for building sex spouse, or not at all. Why should teaching against homosexual sex outside of that be necessary when that covers it all? Actually, Jesus never said anything about sex, period, except to condemn lust and writing statement adultery. He never condemned premarital sex. He did say, according to one gospel, that divorce is never permissible.

This is why the Catholic church doesn’t allow divorce. Another gospel has him saying that divorce is permissible if one’s partner has committed adultery. He seems to clearly condemn remarriage after divorce. Various churches and thesis a computer scholars have differed sharply on what Jesus really meant about divorce and whether one can ever divorce or ever remarry after a divorce. If Christians are serious about having the subliminal research paper, law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for scriptural causes. Thesis Statement A Computer! A special religious court could be set up to determine whether a divorce or remarriage is allowed under biblical guidelines. Also, the prompts 2013, US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried. Like John McCain.

Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Homosexuality, anybody might be able to a computer, redefine it according to their preference without restriciton. I don’t recall anyone saying anything about prompts preference, IMO it is about being fair and statement for building decent. University Of Chicago Essay 2013! I’m sorry, no one has presented a convincing argument for human-dog marriages but feel free to try. If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is thesis statement not acceptable just because dog is mastering the 5 paragraph essay pdf not humanbeing, it is completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of thesis statement a computer, ‘NO’ side of prop 8. True a man who wants to marry a dog doesn’t get his way. So what? A dog still isn’t a human and last time I checked is change global warming not able to enter contracts, not able to make informed consent, in general doesn’t have the thesis for building a computer, intelligence that a human does….even very stupid humans. You have to keep in mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is climate global warming innate. But animals can’t prefer humans, at least not in the sense that you need them to prefer to make a marriage (and I do hope you acknowledge marriage isn’t just about having sex).

There are humans in this category as well. Thesis Statement A Computer! For example, you can’t marry someone whose in a coma. If Christians are serious about having the messages paper, law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for thesis statement a computer, scriptural causes. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in other words. Christians were steamrolled on that one too. One of the arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. A lot of good it did them to try to how to write, talk common sense into the activists and meddlers back then. And would you and the other proponents of monosexed “marriage” be sanguine about throwing out for building No-Fault divorce laws?

HECK NO! You would fight it as nastily as you fight marriage definition amendments. Don’t even pretend otherwise. I advocate getting rid of the No-Fault laws, but that’s not where the current fight is of chicago 2013 taking place. Suggesting that that is where we should take the statement, fight is kind of like a bait-and-switch tactic, or pointing off to space somewhere behind your opponents back and saying “What’s that?” knowing full well that you will be trying to dodge around your opponent if he gets distracted by your ruse. A special religious court could be set up to determine whether a divorce or remarriage is allowed under biblical guidelines. The annulment process in the Catholic Church.

He never condemned premarital sex. Here’s the thing about a thesis statement comparative essay pre-marital sex. It leads to thesis statement, adultery in one way or another. First, if a man has sex with a woman prior to marrying her, the writing for a, religious view is that they should formalize the marriage they consumated. If they don’t, and then later that man gets married to thesis a computer, a different woman, he has retroactively committed adultery. Now some people might consider the second sexual relationship the meta, adulterous one, some might consider the first relationship the adulterous one in a kind of front-loaded sort of way. Either way, the adultery has been committed. And not just for that man, but having not married the woman he had intercourse with in the first place, they are both causing each other to commit adultery which is compounding the sin. Also, the a computer, US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried.

Like John McCain. We are electing a President of the country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Subliminal Messages Research Paper! Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to marry with dog. However my point is that, if all the effort for thesis a computer, redefinition for same sex marriage is allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to any preference. And also we can allow redefining of all other social terms. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for how to write, example, somebody want to marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at present time. However, with the similar logic of requesting for same sex marriage, somebody can complain and thesis statement for building a computer appeal for the permit of the kind marriage with kid.

If law enforce that kid does not have dicernment of right or wrong about the marriage, it is discriminating the university, kid, according to your logic. Acutally, there have been some other countries where marriage with 7 years old has been allowed. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Mature society should be able to set rules and restrict some freedom for common welfare. Clearly you put a lot of effort into thinking through and depicting your position in favor of Proposition 8. However, your argument suffers from for building a computer, enough deficiencies that it fails to support your conclusion. Marriage is messages research paper a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained. When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of families. You conflate two terms here, marriage and families, base your position on the latter, and then use indirection to corral the former. Families are the building block of society.

Civil marriage is a legal construct to original purpose was to protect the statement for building a computer, property rights of women and mastering the children that were, until the Pill, the eventually nearly inevitable outcome of sex. Clearly, protecting the property rights of dependents is important. Thesis Statement! However, in linking families and marriage as you do, you are appealing to the same notions of change global, human nature that animate the left: our nature and actions are determined by society. I doubt very much you believe that; in fact, I’ll bet you believe precisely the opposite. Thesis Statement! However, without that underlying assumption, your conflation fails. And, along the way, it denigrates religious marriage, which sanctifies monogamy regardless of secular legal constructs. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father.” I think that is close enough to objective truth to take as stipulated. However, as a practical matter, it is a thesis for a comparative presents . Within the thesis statement a computer, realm of climate global, human affairs, there will always be some children who do not have such an environment available to them. Even more sadly, there are children for whom there are few options.

In order to complete that statement, it needs to consider those children for whom the statement, options are two: an series of foster parents, or adoption by change warming, a same-sex couple. Appealing to the advisability of married mother and father for thesis statement for building a computer, children is pointless if that option is not on offer. Which leaves the question that matters open and unaddressed: which is least bad, being raised by a married same-sex couple, or foster care? As an aside, SFAIK, same sex couples may adopt children in subliminal research most, if not all, of the 50 states. Whether that is thesis statement for building a good idea or not is a subject for a separate thread that should always keep in mind the bar barbri testing, options on offer. … the same-sex culture still has elements of statement, great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into marriage. Pain and suffering resulting from of chicago prompts 2013, sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. Thesis A Computer! According to write, ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in 175 for gay men after one homosexual encounter. I don’t have the thesis for building, time to research, prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Thesis Statement For Building A Computer! Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to how to meta, be: 5 different partners per month. If the odds of a gay man contracting AIDS are in fact 1 in a computer 175 unique encounters, then essentially all gay men are dead.

Except they aren’t, so that stat needs some explaining. More fundamentally, though, let’s take all those statistics as stipulated. So far as I know, Evangelists agree that mankind is fallen. Your statistics, at best, show that gays are somewhat more fallen than the rest of us. Which demands the question: is mee review testing there a fallenness threshold beyond which marriage is not allowed? If so, then you need to show it, and how gays fall on the far side. Otherwise, these stats, even if true, do not advance your argument even an inch towards its goal. Your moral framework needs foremost to be informed by deciding up front whether morality applies to the situation at thesis for building a computer, hand. In order for something to mastering, assess the morality of thesis for building a computer, something, one must first know the extent to which that thing involves a choice. For instance, (although Christians once thought otherwise), there is absolutely no moral component to being left handed — there is no choice in the matter.

Similarly, no matter how much your evangelical Christian faith informs your moral framework, homosexuality is university essay 2013 not a matter of choice. There simply is no moral component to being gay. Now, you may counter that while there is no moral component to being gay, actualization of that fact is immoral. Unfortunately, not only does that leave you on the horns of the Euthryphro dilemma, it also presents you with a theodicy problem: why would God create a group of people and then demand that others ostracize, and even kill, them? One need not be a Christian in order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality.

For example, you might be Aristotelian. If so, you might consider the anatomical design of men and women and conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. As it happens, all mammals start existence as females. It is only through the thesis statement, Y-linked expression of hormones during gestation that a female body plan becomes male. What would an essay, Aristotelian make of that? Particularly when informed the Jamie Lee Curtis is, by Aristotelian standards, male? Your argument in favor of Prop-8, the result of which is to impose a sectarian notion upon a non-sectarian society, simply fails to make its case. Thesis Statement A Computer! The task facing you is to convince the of chicago prompts 2013, rest of us that allowing gays to marry will somehow corrode marriages for heterosexuals.

As others have noted (Boonton, perhaps), no amount of mayhem to to which groups of heterosexuals are particularly prone constitutes a barrier to marriage, yet requires such for gays. You attempt to make a moral case, but the very foundation of that argument disappears in the absence of choice. Finally, you make an a computer, appeal to statement for a comparative essay, anatomical design without acknowledging its basics or contingencies. Your position makes perfect sense for insisting evangelical Christians refuse the marriage sacrament to thesis statement a computer, gays. Mastering Paragraph Pdf! However, it completely fails to make a case for similarly restricting civil marriage. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in thesis a computer other words. Christians were steamrolled on how to write meta, that one too. One of the statement for building a computer, arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. Whose this ‘we’ here?

Christians? If you’re not supposed to get a divorce except for scriptual reasons then don’t get a divorce except. Are we at the point here where you’re telling us gay marriage must be banned (and no-fault divorce abolished) because Christians need the gov’t to bribe them into following their religion? The annulment process in the Catholic Church. Last time I checked it was alive and well and hasn’t fallen even though it is highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and of chicago essay 2013 is even unpopular among many Catholics. We are electing a President of the country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Thesis A Computer! Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? I guess we just expected something more from someone from the ‘pro-American’ portion of the university of chicago, country. Thesis A Computer! It’s not the first time smmtheory has disappointed. It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to marry with dog.

However my point is that, if all the subliminal messages research, effort for thesis a computer, redefinition for university of chicago essay prompts, same sex marriage is statement allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to any preference. Your error is assuming the subliminal messages research paper, argument in thesis statement a computer favor of gay marriage is simply “well that’s what some gays prefer and we should always do what people prefer”. That is not the stand supporters of gay marriage have taken for bar barbri mee review testing, the simple reason that it is an impossible stand to take. Thesis For Building! People of contradictory preferences, you would rather there be no gay people, some others would rather everyone be gay, others yet would rather be allowed to drive around with a nuclear bomb in their trunk. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for example, somebody want to marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at present time. …. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Mature society should be able to set rules and restrict some freedom for common welfare.

And you yourself introduce the problem with your argument as well as the solution to the question you pose. Instead of subliminal messages research paper, asking why societal terms should ever be redefined, ask the reverse question, when are restrictions on a computer, freedoms good for the common welfare. When you look at essay warming, it from that angle a lot of these questions suddenly get a lot easier. Interracial marriage bans? A restriction on freedom that harms the common welfare therefore it was proper that they were abolished. Thesis A Computer! Marriage of 7 yr olds? Big common welfare problem. How about marriage of 17 yr olds? Well that’s a bit iffier so states of differing rules. Since your argument doesn’t connect the dots, doesn’t demonstrate how gay marriage would harm the common welfare, I don’t think it makes it.

I don’t have the time to climate change global, prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to be: 5 different partners per month. 1. This is kind of technical but why should one assume a bell curve distribution of gay promiscuity rather than say a power law distribution? The bell curve fits certain sets of data like height. Most people are a few inches around the ‘average height’ with fewer and fewer people more distant from thesis statement for building a computer, that average. A power law follows a distribution like income. If you calculate the average income by exluding the richest 0.05% you’ll get a radically lower number than if you include them. Removing a few thousand of America’s tallest people will not dramatically alter the average height of writing statement for a essay, all Americans. 2. Given this possibility, even if 5 in 1 is the population average there are gay men who are less than 5 in one..

Possibly a great number with a smalle portion being ‘super promiscious’ enough to impact the average dramatically. 3. Statement For Building A Computer! Again given this, are there no gay men who have no partners per month? Who, for writing statement for a essay, whatever reason, have not had any sex or haven’t had any in a while? Or perhaps are having (gay) sex on rare occassions like what we suspect of thesis for building a computer, Idaho’s Senator Larry Craig? How does the writing essay, study capture these men and thesis for building a computer add their data to properly calculate the average? If part of your argument is testing hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of for building, sand and essay 2013 one of the worse things you can do is read too much into an average. The ‘we’ here is American society at large. That 50% divorce rate is what is generally quoted for American society as a whole, not just Christians alone. Thesis For Building! But you kind of prove my point about writing a thesis statement comparative essay how advocates for monosexed “marriage” would fight against thesis a computer repeal of No-Fault just as nastily as they fight for monosexed “marriage”.

Last time I checked it was alive and well and essay climate warming hasn’t fallen even though it is highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and is even unpopular among many Catholics. It still fits the bill of what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. What’s your point? I don’t know why you continue to a computer, presume to speak for Christians when you are not one. I guess we just expected something more from someone from the ‘pro-American’ portion of the country.

It’s not the first time smmtheory has disappointed. Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. Research Paper! After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the for building a computer, gravest of all sins among the moral relativists? It still fits the bill of how to, what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. What’s your point?

I don’t know why you continue to presume to statement, speak for Christians when you are not one. I speak only for myself and I feel sorry for any group that requires you to statement, speak for them. As for for building a computer, the Catholic Church, I fail to bar barbri testing, see the problem. If you abide by thesis, their teachings about marriage, you will not get remarried if divorced despite the essay global, fact that civil law has no objection (and many evangelical churchs might welcome your remarriage with open arms). The Catholic Church doesn’t require the a computer, gov’t to bribe people to follow their teachings, why do you? Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the gravest of all sins among the writing statement for a essay, moral relativists? 1. You failed to point out any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses. 2. Thesis For Building! I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of a contradiction? Kind of like an write, underdressed nudist? There is huge misunderstanding from ‘No’ side of prop 8. Most people in ‘No’ side of prop 8 misuderstand that the the same sex marriage is one of statement, civi right movement in line with the past civil right movement started in 1960s.

The past civil right movoment was not about ‘WHAT’ but about ‘HOW’. In other words, the university essay, movement has targeted to thesis for building a computer, break down twisted social hierachy in order to give all social members equality. Of Chicago Essay Prompts! The real civil right movement have never attempted to destroy fundamental ‘WHAT’ of this society. However the same sex marriage is quite different than the real civil right movement because it is targeting to destruct our society into complete mess and uncontrollable status. They are destroying the thesis for building, fundamental ‘WHAT’. IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. And actually the destruction path might be guaranteed for human_being just because of this disastful concept of same sex marriage. Look beyond 20 years from now and consider how this world will be like.

I am very concerning for my next generation just because of this kind of sinful movement. Please look at your conscience and watch for what will happen next. They are destroying the fundamental ‘WHAT’.IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. Do you always tune up the a thesis for a essay, rhetoric when you’re losing an argument? Look beyond 20 years from thesis statement for building, now and consider how this world will be like. I see two likely possibilities: A: 20 years from now a tiny portion of gays use gay marriage. Many that did got burned badly when failed relationships left them dividing assets and paying alimony to partners they no longer wanted to be with. B: 20 years from now a portion of gays use gay marriage. Like other demographic groups they have ‘success rates’ (defined as no divorces within 5 years of marriage) that are sometimes greater and sometiems smaller than heterosexuals as a whole or sub-cohorts of heterosexuals. In both cases the existence of gay marriage has no detectable impact on the far more popular heterosexual marriages (about 95% of all marriages).

Like today some churches recognize gay marriages, others do not. There is probably more acceptance of a thesis for a comparative essay, gay marriage itself in for building a computer the population but again it is nearly impossible to detect any impact positive or negative on essay mee review testing, heterosexual marriage. Can you give us a plausible future scenario? I’ve asked several times now for ‘yes’ supporters to show exactly how existence of marriage for a small minority group directly impacts their ability to be good husbands, wives, fathers, and thesis for building a computer mothers. Connect the dots for climate change global, us.

The Catholic Church doesn’t require the gov’t to bribe people to follow their teachings, why do you? And just where do you think I do require the government to bribe people to follow the civic law? If there is thesis statement for building a specific argument I have made, please point it out. Essay Climate! As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the government apportions to marriage if it meant the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit advocating for government recognition. Statement A Computer! I could care less whether or not churches outside of Christianity condone such practices. There have even been churches that were nominally inside of Christianity who have turned their backs on essay climate global warming, Christianity and condoned such practices as monosexed marriage. What I do care about for building is the damage that is being done to children through the government recognition of writing comparative essay, monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the least able to protect themselves, and this is thesis a computer being used to run roughshod over messages research, the children by adults who refuse to be adults. 1. You failed to thesis statement for building a computer, point out any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses.

2. I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of a contradiction? Kind of like an underdressed nudist? 1. No, I didn’t fail to point it out, you failed to acknowledge that I pointed it out. It looks like you have a mental block against recognizing that you seem to have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. 2. Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and hypocrisy IS a contradiction. Please read carefully my point in line. It is clear that the issue of “Interracial marriage bans” is completly different with “Same sex marriage” issue. I believe that it was absolutely right to abolish the Interracial marriage bans. And also I STRONGLY supported for mastering essay, the other civil right movements of the past. Thesis Statement A Computer! However Homosexuality absolutely cannot be civil right movement, simply because it can destruct human_being.

If you can see further down the road, you might be able to see my point about why it can be disatrous to the human being and next generation. What I do care about essay change warming is the for building a computer, damage that is being done to children through the messages research paper, government recognition of monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the least able to a computer, protect themselves, and this is being used to run roughshod over the children by adults who refuse to be adults. OK, please be specific here. Children are generated by heterosexuals except in the rather limited case of write meta, test tube babies. So what exactly are you talking about?

looks like you have a mental block against statement for building recognizing that you seem to subliminal, have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. I don’t have any particular problem with McCain’s adultery. I wasn’t part of his marriage, it is primarily his concern. I have my own problems to deal with. 2. Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and hypocrisy IS a contradiction. You ‘might ought’ put more effort into statement for building a computer your own arguments. You asked a question and essay I tried to answer it as best I could. Please try to return the thesis for building, favor. Connect the dots for us because quite frankly I have no idea what you’re talking about and I suspect you’re pumping up the climate change global, rhetoric without thinking about the debts your reasoning and logic skills are going to thesis statement, have to make good on. If part of your argument is hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of sand and one of the messages, worse things you can do is read too much into an average.

Ii think we are in violent agreement here, but since my post turned out to be a festival of editing errors, I will restate. Dustin used a number of statistics. Collectively, they beg disbelief. If homosexuals are both, as a group, promiscuous, and the rate of contracting AIDS is one in 175 unique encounters, then there are no homosexuals. Granted, I was exaggerating a little; I should have said there would be no, or very few, gays who survive past middle age. In other words, on thesis a computer, the face of it, one of those two statistics must be wrong. Not that it matters, because, as you (at least I think it was you) pointed out climate global warming above, applying such reasoning to gays, but neglecting to thesis for building a computer, do so for heterosexuals, rather reeks of hypocrisy. As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the government apportions to marriage if it meant the mastering paragraph pdf, advocates for monosexed marriage would quit advocating for thesis, government recognition. So, let me get this straight. Essay Global! You want non-sectarian government to adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to do whatever they want? Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral.

What if Christianity is wrong? It’s tedious work but it is often interesting to probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Thesis For Building A Computer! Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to essay global warming, sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to thesis statement a computer, snow their readers over. For example: 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an unfootnoted statement that: “78% of lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against essay mee review an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is only female partners or female and male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the for building a computer, second page of subliminal research, this document lists ‘types of thesis for building a computer, abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of a thesis for a, shame’ as part of sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the partner or of the relationship’ without the thesis statement for building, other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to include a lot more than what many of us think of when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on. Not only mastering the 5 paragraph essay pdf, that, if one partner in thesis a computer any relationship ever felt like they were being made to feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure.

Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the phrase: “18% of bar barbri testing, this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for thesis a computer, blow or insult for insult'” Insult for insult? Are we talking about an accurate measure of abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Mastering The 5 Essay! Recent studies show that 95.6% of thesis for building, gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Bar Barbri Mee Review Testing! Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in the study have lasted longer than 8 years. 29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is statement for building a computer a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years.

Amazing because there is essay almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. Thesis Statement A Computer! It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per university of chicago essay 2013 month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Here is the fact, conservatives know better. Years ago feminists were complaining about the superbowel being a time of record domestic violence of men against women. Conservatives took apart the for building, numbers and demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at all.

So the mee review testing, right has…or at least had…the ability to talk intelligently about thesis statement a computer statistics. What accounts for this newfound ignorance? So, let me get this straight. The 5 Essay Pdf! You want non-sectarian government to statement for building, adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to messages research paper, do whatever they want? I don’t believe that it is specifically a sectarian position. A lot of non-believers think that monosexed “marriage” is invalid also, and may also believe that it is immoral. I don’t care to interfere in what the homosexuals do in the privacy of their own sects and statement for building a computer homes.

I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the essay global warming, violence that such an statement for building, arrangement entails. If homosexuals want to how to write meta, pretend they are married, they should be allowed to pretend, but since their arrangement would not naturally produce children, children should be lawfully excluded from their midst. Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral. What if Christianity is wrong? Christianity isn’t wrong about that, but even if I grant you the position for thesis a computer, argument’s sake, where is the harm of being told that it is immoral? If Christianity is right though, the harm is essay change global warming much worse thinking that it is thesis statement for building a computer not. It’s tedious work but it is bar barbri essay mee review testing often interesting to probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over.

For example: 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an thesis for building a computer, unfootnoted statement that: “78% of lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is only female partners or female and male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the essay pdf, second page of this document lists ‘types of abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of shame’ as part of thesis statement a computer, sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the subliminal research paper, partner or of the thesis statement for building a computer, relationship’ without the other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to subliminal messages research, include a lot more than what many of us think of for building, when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on.

Not only that, if one partner in any relationship ever felt like they were being made to feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure. Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the phrase: “18% of this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for blow or insult for messages research, insult'” Insult for insult? Are we talking about an accurate measure of abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Thesis! Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an essay climate global, average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in statement the study have lasted longer than 8 years.

29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of bar barbri essay testing, relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for statement, years. Here is the fact, conservatives know better.

Years ago feminists were complaining about the superbowel being a time of record domestic violence of men against women. Mastering Paragraph Essay! Conservatives took apart the numbers and demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at all. So the right has…or at least had…the ability to thesis for building, talk intelligently about subliminal messages research statistics. Statement For Building! What accounts for this newfound ignorance? I do believe though that the how to write meta, non-sectarian government should protect children from the violence that such an thesis statement for building a computer, arrangement entails. What exactly are you talking about? What exactly are you talking about? I am referring to the violence done to children by writing a thesis statement essay, exposing them to thesis a computer, homosexuals pretending to write, be married to for building, each other. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over.

This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. A Thesis Statement For A Comparative! It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per a computer month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Need I say more Mr. The 5 Paragraph Pdf! Statistics Hawker? So your not actually talking about for building a computer gay marriage but children ‘exposed’ to gay couples. OK, next time please let us know before post 50 that we can ignore you. Need I say more Mr. Writing Statement Essay! Statistics Hawker? Nope, you guys are caught hawking bum stats.

I wouldn’t say anything more if I were you. I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the violence that such an statement, arrangement entails. What point are you trying to make? Even if gay marriages to subject children to some sort of unique violence (I don’t have time to track down the how to write, link, but IIRC, lesbian couples have a far lower rate of child abuse than heterosexual couples with one step parent, particularly where the step parent is male), that really has nothing to do with gay marriage. Gays may already adopt children in many, if not most, states. In all states, they can produce children through artificial insemination or surrogate motherhood. If that is what bothers you, than is what you should be fighting against. However, as I mentioned above, even granting there is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and thesis statement for building a computer father , that forces a false dichotomy. For those children adopted by gay couples, the choice isn’t between a family with a mother and father, but rather between an adopted family, or endless foster care. Given the true choice on offer, which is best for a thesis statement comparative, children? Christianity isn’t wrong about that, but even if I grant you the thesis statement for building a computer, position for argument’s sake, where is the paragraph essay pdf, harm of thesis statement a computer, being told that it is how to write meta immoral?

Oh, the same kind of harm that comes from certain Hindu sects deciding those suffering from cleft palate are possessed by statement a computer, the devil, or certain Christian sects having (no longer, thank goodness) that being left handed meant the essay pdf, same thing. I could go on, but I won’t, because the fatal weakness in that statement is how utterly un-American it is. You are branding every member of a group by the presumed characteristics of statement for building a computer, that group. That is pure tribalism. In contrast, the American ideal rests upon individual merit. Branding an entire group immoral because of an innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is subliminal paper what makes the Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is immoral so desperately wrong.

There is thesis no morality without agency. Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Sex acts have no inherent moral value. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from essay testing, context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is for building a computer moral, no matter the gender of the participants. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of a theodicy problem for mastering, which you have no answer. What point are you trying to statement a computer, make. I do not remember the bar barbri essay testing, exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. Branding an entire group immoral because of an statement, innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is what makes the Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is immoral so desperately wrong.

There is no morality without agency. Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an paragraph, innate quality. Every consensual sex act requires a choice of whether to engage in it or not. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from statement for building, context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is moral, no matter the gender of the participants. Setting aside the fact that I disagree about whether or not the research paper, moral value of a sex act derives entirely from the context, your context is out of whack. The only morally good context is between husband and wife. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of thesis, a theodicy problem for which you have no answer. Given the essay, proper context, there is no need for theodicy, there is a computer no conundrum, it is simple and writing a thesis statement for a comparative straight-forward without nuance. Homosexual sex is not between husband and for building wife, so it is therefore immoral. I do not remember the exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child.

You’re right, such children should just be aborted. More seriously, though, this has nothing to do with gay marriage. Statement For A Comparative Essay! The question to thesis a computer, ask is what is the alternative? By definition adopted children are cases where, for whatever reason, the paragraph pdf, heterosexual parents are unable to thesis a computer, implement the write meta, ideal for for building, their child (whether it’s their fault or not). You can complain, I suppose, about university of chicago prompts children created through IVF for gay couples but the question is what is the alternative? Would you rather have life with two gay parents or have no life at all? I do not remember the exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in thesis a computer saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. With respect to what, exactly? While I haven’t checked up on this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the essay climate warming, priority list.

That means, IIRC, gay couples are adopting children no one else will. So, I’ve asked before, and I’ll ask again: which is worse, adoption by a gay couple, or foster care? Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an innate quality. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color. Orientation and action are two different things. Which leaves the theodicy problem still in front of you. You could relieve that problem by concluding that those who wrote the Bible presumed the drive behind same-sex acts was a choice, and, therefore, concluded — wrongly — that engaging in them was based upon choice. Of course, to do that would hole Biblical credibility below the water line. Heck of a place — stuck between the devil of theodicy, and the deep blue sea of discrediting the Bible. The only thesis a computer, morally good context is between husband and wife.

Why? What it it about essay climate change global warming homosexual sex that makes it immoral? Beware of the thesis for building a computer, Euthyphros dilemma, BTW. Full disclosure: my brother is gay. Bar Barbri Mee Review Testing! Consequently, I have a fair amount of first hand experience with gays. The notion that they are somehow irredeemably immoral in ways the rest of us are not is statement complete crap, and deserves precisely the statement essay, same respect that, say, anti-Judaism does. Why are my posts not posting? It appears that if I post concerning the for building, subject at hand, no post. But if I post concerning . . . nothing . . Mastering Paragraph Pdf! . it posts. Why? What does it mean when it says my post is being held by the owner of the blog?

This blog has a spam filter. Sometimes whenever there’s an thesis a computer, issue that involves any sexuality-type of topic it snags comments, thinking they are spam. Bar Barbri Mee Review Testing! I sometimes email Joe when that happens or you can try to statement for building a computer, rewrite your blog using slightly different words (like SSM instead of same sex marriage). I don’t know if Joe is still managing the filter or not so there might be no one at the switch to approve comments that are held. It’s usually better to rewrite your post because by messages, the time the comment is cleared people will mostly be reading only the newest comments at the bottom of the thread and will not notice that a comment has appeared in thesis statement a computer the center. “Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an bar barbri essay testing, innate quality.” I feel that this really is at the root of thesis statement a computer, a lot of misunderstandings about homosexuality. It is quite definitely not a choice. Trust me on comparative essay, this.

I’ve always found it an apt metaphor to compare homosexuality to left-handedness. Both are inbuilt preferences – inclinations towards certain behaviour. Most people are right-handed, just as most people are heterosexual. For Building A Computer! Homosexuals CAN teach themselves to testing, sleep with women in the same way that a left-handed person CAN teach themselves to write or use scissors with their right hand, but it will always feel counter-intuitive for them. Thesis A Computer! For them, it will never feel (ironically considering common objections to homosexuality) natural. It is a choice whether to admit to yourself and mee review testing others around you that you are gay. But you can no more change your sexual orientation than you can change which hand you prefer.

Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard. The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from statement, birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is no excuse. Mastering The 5 Paragraph Essay! Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for them to pillage the village. Wow! Maybe I’m in statement for building a little gay bubble in statement for a comparative Los Angeles, but all the gay couples I know (and I know a ton, mind you) are older and very monogamous.

In fact, they are quite boring. Some have adopted, and for building a computer they are wonderful parents. I think many ignorant folk here imagine the gay community as just guys in ass-less chaps on a gay pride float. It would be like thinking of heterosexuals on Spring Break in change global Fort Lauderdale. I still haven’t heard from any of you a good argument on statement a computer, exactly how two women walking the aisle will personally ruin your own marriage. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over. And not long after you wrote that, in for a essay the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself. Were you trying to snow the readers over? You made your own interpretation of statistics to favor your argument. This is statement a computer a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years. How To Write Meta! Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together.

It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at thesis statement, the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Would you think it so odd if the same statistics applied to university of chicago prompts, married heterosexuals? I predict that you would not, and that you would attribute it to infidelity. Thesis Statement A Computer! You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and wrong based on your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. And not long after you wrote that, in the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself.

Yea I looked at some of the reports that were being cited by YOU GUYS. You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and wrong based on essay climate change, your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. I certainly made no assumption that there would be no infidelity among long term gay couples nor did I assume that infidelity rates would be equal to or lower than heterosexual couples. Take a peek at post 48 if you need a refresher. I suspect all things being equal long term lesbian relationships would probably have lower infidelity rate than heterosexuals as a whole while long term gay male relationships would have a higher one…. Would you think it so odd if the same statistics applied to married heterosexuals? No but that’s not the point. For Building A Computer! The point is how to it’s pretty amazing if the only information you had was Richard’s sensationalistic reading of the primary sources.

While I haven’t checked up on this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the priority list. Some of them, mostly religiously affiliated adoption services. Thesis! I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Activists sometimes apply legal pressure to force them to, but usually that sort of research, coercion only thesis statement for building, persuades them to of chicago essay prompts, shut down rather than operate against doctrinal beliefs and thesis for building a computer policy. Between the two choices of foster home care and placement with a homosexual couple, the meta, foster home placement is preferable in my opinion. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color.

To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is not a mating practice. Homosexual acts can no more produce offspring than self pleasuring alone at home. If a person really wants to mate, they go to the opposite sex. Preferences are choices. Putting little or no thought into it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Between the thesis for building a computer, two choices of foster home care and placement with a homosexual couple, the foster home placement is preferable in my opinion. Florida, I believe, prohibits gay adoption but permits gay foster parents. Forcing a kid to essay climate change global warming, grow up with no real parents, to live on edge of being whisked away from the caretakers he lives with isn’t doing them any favors. The call that should be made here is what is thesis statement best for the child, not the ideological fixations of the evangelical right. If they want to stop gay adoption they should swarm the adoption agencies with applications from how to meta, well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to adding adopted and foster kids to their families. If they want to thesis a computer, stop gay adoption they should swarm the bar barbri essay, adoption agencies with applications from well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to thesis statement, adding adopted and essay mee review foster kids to their families.

I totally agree! This whole argument seems to statement for building a computer, me, as a Christian, rather fruitless. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is university of chicago prompts 2013 sinful. Period. It doesn’t matter what stats are brought up, and it doesn’t matter about biology. The only way you can convince an evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against a computer Prop 8 is to make them take the Bible less seriously. Conversely, I seriously doubt that statistics are going to mastering paragraph, convince a homosexual that he or she is an unfit parent b/c some homosexuals are promiscuous or mean or whatever.

I’m not going to stop pursuing adoption b/c some other “Christian” beats their children. That’s ridiculous. The problem here for thesis, anti-Prop 8 folks is not stats; it’s the Bible. Homosexual sex, just like heterosexual sex outside of marriage, is sinful. The only way you can convince an essay testing, evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against Prop 8 is to statement, make them take the Bible less seriously. The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against how to write all secular law.

Don’t believe in thesis statement gay marriage, don’t get gay married. The 5 Pdf! Reject membership in statement for building a computer any Church that has gay marriage. Tell gay married friends that you think they are making a major mistake with their lives. If they are convinced by your arguments, great. If not you leave them alone. This is essay what Catholics who take the church’s doctrine on divorce seriously. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard.

The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from for building a computer, birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is university of chicago no excuse. Statement A Computer! Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for them to pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in light of the fact that God specifically created homosexuals, who have utterly no choice in the matter, then went on to direct people to mastering, kill those caught engaging in homosexual acts? This goes well beyond the doctrine of statement a computer, original sin. Your analogy to theft is faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how homosexuality breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is homosexuality immoral?

I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of does extensive background checks, and mastering the 5 paragraph essay pdf puts M-F married couples at thesis statement for building a computer, the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Raising once again the question: is it better that children grow up in foster care, or be adopted by a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here.

There is an objective truth out there, what is it? To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is mee review testing not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to thesis statement for building, mate. Putting little or no thought into it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out the 5 pdf decision. Is your heterosexuality a choice? Could you decide to engage in homosexuality? I’m going to go out on thesis for building, a limb here: No, and No.

You are denying to how to meta, others that which you assume for yourself. Here is statement a computer why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is sinful. Subliminal! Period. That amounts to the good German defense. (See the Euthyphros dilemma, above). Thanks for the info . . . The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against all secular law. Certainly not, but we still get a vote. And if we think a practice is evil, then we can vote no (or yes, as the case may be.) In this case, I think homosexual sex is not only evil, I think calling the union of two homosexuals ‘marriage’ is absurd. The Bible says it is statement a computer wickedness in no uncertain terms.

What else can I say? Now my reply is being held up … You’re not being asked to vote on whether or not you think gay sex is evil or not anymore than you are asked to vote on subliminal, whether people who marry for money rather than love are evil or whether it’s evil to ditch your wife after she gets disfigured in a car accident…. There are plenty of thesis statement for building a computer, things that one thinks are evil that are nonetheless legal and it doesn’t follow that just being evil is sufficient to justify making it illegal. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard. University Of Chicago Prompts 2013! The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s orientation can be perverted even from birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is for building no excuse. Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for writing a thesis, them to pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. For Building! How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in light of the fact that God specifically created homos*xuals, who have utterly no choice in the matter, then went on for a, to direct people to kill those caught engaging in thesis homos*xual acts? This goes well beyond the doctrine of original sin.

Your analogy to paragraph pdf, theft is faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how someone else’s being gay breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is being gay immoral? I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homos*xual couples below heteros*xual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of does extensive background checks, and puts M-F married couples at thesis statement for building, the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with same gender couples.

Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Raising once again the how to write, question: is it better that children grow up in foster care, or be adopted by statement a computer, a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here. There is an objective truth out essay there, what is it? To pick a nit with your statement… homos*xual practice is for building a computer not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the subliminal paper, result of the drive to mate. Putting little or no thought into it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Is your being straight a choice?

Could you decide to become gay, even for a day? I’m going to thesis for building, go out on mastering the 5 pdf, a limb here: No, and No. You are denying to others that which you assume for yourself. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that gay behavior is sinful. A Computer! Period. That amounts to university essay 2013, the good German defense. Statement For Building A Computer! (See the Euthyphros dilemma, above). Yes, you did erect a strawman. Presumably, you are arguing against someone like myself. I believe that men are inherently sinful b/c we fell in of chicago essay 2013 Adam.

God is not obligated to rescue us from sin of any kind: homos*xual s*x is thesis statement for building a computer just one of those. It’s no problem of “theodicy” because we are all guilty of sin. It goes like this: God created man good. Man sinned and became sinful. God is university prompts 2013 under no obligation to rectify this (even though He has for all who believe in Jesus.) People perish, Skipper, because they refuse to believe the truth of God in thesis statement Jesus Christ. Do you want to escape the essay mee review, wrath to statement for building, come?

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. If you don’t believe and you perish, don’t blame God. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is being gay immoral? The Bible gives us truth. I read this as saying, “Other than on account of it being true that homosexuality is university of chicago 2013 immoral, why is being gay immoral?” What I think and you think is irrelevant if the Bible is true.

Why should I leave the Bible as true for someone else’s stats and pontifications? That amounts to the good German defense. Does this look like German to you?: “Do not be deceived: neither the thesis statement a computer, sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9). Besides, Thomas Aquinas and others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. He also found it to be a false dilemma. University Essay Prompts 2013! Here’s one example I took from the thesis a computer, “Stand to Reason” site: An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma). However, the standard is not external to God, but internal (avoiding the second horn). Morality is grounded in the immutable character of mastering the 5 paragraph essay, God, who is perfectly good. His commands are not whims, but rooted in His holiness.

My point in all this is that you will never win a Bible believing Christian to your view. Conversely, I don’t know why anyone would be persuaded of the Biblical view unless they have already submitted to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Is your being straight a choice? Could you decide to statement for building a computer, become gay, even for a day? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and No. That was indeed going out on a limb, and the limb wasn’t even there to go out on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is a choice. If I chose to of chicago essay prompts 2013, practice homos-exuality, I could. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the thesis statement a computer, most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Let me translate this for you since you have erred. Some individuals within the of chicago prompts, agency went against Church doctrine to statement a computer, place those children in homos-exual settings.

It was NOT agency policy to subliminal paper, be non-conforming to Church teaching. When the Church heirarchy found out about it, the people that erred in conformance were told to conform. In other words, if your employer has a policy that none of the workers smokes at work and you sneakily do so, does that mean that your employer’s policy allows workers to smoke at work? Strictly speaking it is, because it is the statement a computer, result of the university of chicago prompts, drive to mate. No, it is borne of a desire to self-pleasure. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES..

ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD.. ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME..

SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION.. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. Statement For Building! WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES.. ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD..

ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME.. SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION..

SMMTheory – Having gay sex does not make you gay. WANTING to have gay sex makes you gay. A gay person COULD sleep with a woman just as you COULD sleep with a man. But it wouldn’t make him straight or you gay. What makes a person gay is mastering the 5 their personal desires and inner thoughts, not their actions. And these are things obviously beyond our control. SMMTheory – And how did you arrive at the conclusion that homosexuality is about self-pleasuring? Has it ever occured to you that gay people fall in for building a computer love? They are human beings too.

With regard to strawmen, you are evading the point at hand. The theodicy problem here is squaring God’s goodness and providence with God specifically creating people whose mating preference is for essay climate, those of their own gender, then specifically commanding people to kill them (Lev 20:13 — well, men anyway) when acting upon the drive God uniquely gave them, then declared sinful in all its manifestations. This goes beyond problematic human nature (ignoring for the moment how God could have created men good and thesis statement a computer sinful at the same time) by placing a unique curse on writing for a essay, a few people. Of course God does under no obligation to rectify that which God has caused. However, that is no advertisement for God’s goodness and for building a computer providence. Hence, the unique theodicy problem: specifically creating a special kind of sinfulness, then directing people to kill when it occurs. Does this look like German to change global warming, you? Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to assume the Good German defense. Thesis For Building! The inhabitants of that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at all why.

Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in that, in of chicago essay prompts 2013 and of for building a computer, itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. The moment you accept something as so purely by argument from authority, you have adopted the Good German defense. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone? You? I seem to mastering essay, remember Jesus saying something to the effect that sexually immoral thinking is just as bad as act itself. Consequently, all you have managed to conclude here is that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of us. Besides, Thomas Aquinas and others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. He also found it to be a false dilemma. Here’s one example I took from the “Stand to Reason” site: “An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma).

However, the thesis for building, standard is a thesis essay not external to God, but internal (avoiding the second horn). A Computer! Morality is grounded in the immutable character of God, who is perfectly good. His commands are not whims, but rooted in His holiness.” The trouble with this being that once the paragraph essay pdf, theological debris is cleared and you understand what it is they’re getting at, you find yourself right back at the first horn. If goodness is part of thesis for building, God’s nature, then goodness is not something God has any control over, and divine command theory is subliminal messages research incorrect. That was indeed going out on a limb, and the limb wasn’t even there to go out on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is statement for building a computer a choice. If I chose to practice homos-exuality, I could.

That is an empty assertion. Climate Change! You could choose to dress a pig in statement a tutu and paint it green. Meta! But since you never would actually make that choice, making that statement is no better than attempting to assert a null. Let me translate this for you since you have erred. Statement A Computer! Some individuals within the agency went against Church doctrine to place those children in bar barbri essay homos-exual settings. It was NOT agency policy to be non-conforming to Church teaching. I didn’t err — it actually happened; whether it accorded with Church doctrine is a separate matter.

However, it is worth bringing up in its own right, because it reiterates a question I have raised before, but you have avoided. Which is worse, having same-s*x couples adopt a child, or that child being raised in foster homes? If the thesis statement for building a computer, latter (and I strongly suspect that is true), then Church doctrine amounts to enforcing a choice detrimental to the children for whom the ideal choice does not exist. I’m glad I don’t have to defend that position. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the writing comparative, result of the drive to mate. No, it is borne of thesis statement, a desire to self-pleasure. No more than heteros-xuality is. That the coupling can’t result in offspring doesn’t mean the desire to couple doesn’t have the same basis.

IMHO, gays should have simply left well enough alone for essay mee review testing, another ten years. By which time nearly everyone will view this kerfuffle through the same lens we now view, say, miscegenation: what the heck were they thinking? In the meantime, there is nothing to be gained by annoying those whose religious precepts still make it moral to ostracize an entire group of people simply for the way they were born, for thesis statement for building, doing something that causes no one else any harm. What portion of the population was conceived out of a motive for self-pleasure versus a purposeful motive of mating? Well, you partially got my point concerning human nature. I’m not going to go over the supposed two horns of the dilemma you presented though. It has been satisfactorily answered for a few hundred years now. Your “Good German” argument is precisely my point, except we’re not “Good Germans,” we’re “Good Evangelicals.” (Some of whom happen to be good Germans.) All Bible-believing Christians appeal to writing a thesis statement for a, the Bible for their final authority.

We believe it to be an statement for building a computer, infallible source of mastering the 5, truth. Did you not know that? We have a host of reasons for thesis statement, believing this to be true, and you have probably heard them before and we’d stray from the point if we want there. A Thesis Comparative! So if your point is statement that I’ve believed that homosexuality is immoral simply b/c I read it in the Bible and essay accept it as authoritative, I’m willing to concede that. There are other reasons for believing this to be so, but that, in the end, is why evangelicals vote “Yes” to Prop 8. Everyone, ultimately, accepts an argument from authority. I do not accept the thesis statement, authority of Scripture uncritcally, there are reasons.

But I’ve tipped my hand for you and shown you my cards. Comparative! you know my source of authority. But it’s not enough for you to for building, smell my rotten egg; you’ve got to lay your own. What is your authority? Man’s reason? Here’s the best part of what you said: Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to university of chicago essay prompts 2013, assume the Good German defense. The inhabitants of that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at all why. Thesis Statement! Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in that, in the 5 pdf and of statement a computer, itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone?

You? I seem to remember Jesus saying something to the effect that sexually immoral thinking is essay climate warming just as bad as act itself. I apologize if I wasn’t clear before, and thesis though I’d be happy to talk about messages research it, I’m not interested in this forum in outlining all the statement for building a computer, ways in bar barbri testing which homosexuality is statement a computer harmful to essay mee review testing, those who practice it and for those who approve of it. Thesis! My answers are Biblical anyway, and as I said before, I would not expect anyone to how to write meta, believe them if they haven’t first submitted to the Lordship of Jesus Christ anyway. But you are right.

1 Cor. Statement! 6:9 condemns all sorts of people in this passage. And Jesus did say that even calling your brother a “fool” puts one in a thesis statement for a comparative danger of thesis a computer, hellfire. So yeah, you’re right about Jesus being strict on sins other than those that pick my pocket and break my leg. So I whole-heartedly agree with this statement you made, and I applaud it: Consequently, all you have managed to conclude here is climate change that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of thesis statement, us. There is hope for sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Bar Barbri Essay! Swindlers, fornicators et al. That’s where I always want to wind up in the conversation. Before someone can see Christ Jesus as the thesis for building, only hope, they need to be aware of the testing, reason that they need a hope, and thesis for building pretending that certain things that are sinful and evil are actually good and approved will have the result of letting them continue to perdition without warning. Our real disagreement, the subliminal messages paper, root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and love and sexual inclination.

It revolves around what you and I believe about Jesus Christ and whether or not the Bible is true. Right? We believe [the Bible] to be an infallible source of truth. That is the problem. Statement! It is university of chicago not infallible (Thou shalt not kill, thall shalt kill gays caught in the act). And, while it may be a source of truth, that does not mean everything in it is thesis statement true. The problem Evangelicals are faced with here is asserting homos-xuality is ipso facto immoral, because the Bible says so. No doubt, it clearly does. However, as I mentioned above, the notion of morality applies only to the extent there is meta free will. Because of this, among the very few who still insist being gay is a matter of choice, Evangelicals are prominent. Thesis For Building A Computer! Yield on the matter of choice, then the whole question of morality starts looking irrelevant.

Worse, it provokes the of chicago 2013, theodicy problem that you have pretty much ignored. Theodicy, in thesis a computer its simple form, attempts to vindicate divine goodness and subliminal providence in the view of the existence of evil. That really isn’t particularly difficult: humans would not be humans without free will; free will entails evil. However, that question gets much harder to deal with when acknowledging that God specifically created a subset of people who, having no choice in the matter, were going to be the for building a computer, target of God-directed ostracism, opprobrium, and murder. People whose humanity, by meta, the way, makes them as dependent upon mental and physical affection as you are. Of course, God can do anything God wants. But, if the words “goodness” and “providence” are to have any meaning whatsoever, then creating gays presents a glaring contradiction. That contradiction can only be resolved by giving up on theodicy, or concluding that, in the case, the Bible is thesis a computer wrong: being gay is not immoral, and morality of acting on that impulse is contained wholly within context: monogamous homos-xuality is no more immoral than monogamous heteros-xuality. Yielding that, however, admits that the Bible is how to write meta not an statement for building, infallible source of truth; rather, it contains assertions that are presented as true, but are, in fact, morally indefensible. What is your authority? Man’s reason?

Well, yes. Mastering Paragraph Pdf! Words have meanings. In order for an action to for building a computer, be immoral, the actor must have a meaningful choice, the of chicago essay prompts 2013, action cannot be imposed upon for building someone else, and the action cannot significantly impose upon those not parties to the act. By all these measures, homos-xuality is write meta no more immoral than heteros-xuality, because neither, absent context, has any moral content whatsoever. In other words, on this score, the Bible’s assertions are simply wrong. Thesis For Building A Computer! Whoever wrote those words was operating under a fundamental misapprehension, and falling prey to one of the most pernicious elements of human nature: the desire to messages research, demonize those who are different. I’m not interested in this forum in outlining all the ways in thesis statement a computer which homosexuality is subliminal messages paper harmful to those who practice it and for those who approve of it. Well, perhaps you should be. The alternative is to insist upon the immorality of statement for building, a group of people while leaving on the table precisely why they are immoral.

To the extent your answers are Biblical, the insistence upon making secular marriage unavailable to write meta, gays crumbles. There is hope for sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Swindlers, fornicators et al. So, what happens to a monogamous gay couple who accepts Jesus as their savior? Are they uniquely condemned, as opposed to statement a computer, everyone else who accepts Jesus? If not, and I see no Biblical reason to conclude otherwise, then your citation of this passage doesn’t seem particularly relevant to the matter at hand. Our real disagreement, the testing, root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and love and sexual inclination. It revolves around what you and I believe about Jesus Christ and whether or not the Bible is true.

Right? Full disclosure: I am an agnostic areligionist. (Agnostic, because I think the question of whether a supreme being exists is unanswerable; areligionist because I think all religions are man made out of whole cloth). Now, that doesn’t mean that I would necessarily disagree with the thesis statement a computer, conclusions of a scripturally based argument, regardless of how I think the Bible came to be. In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at a conclusion I believe to be profoundly immoral. That is what this revolves around. That is the problem. It is not infallible. Well there you go! Is that an comparative essay, argument from authority, btw? I’ll give you mine, “Yes, it is!”

In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at for building, a conclusion I believe to writing a thesis essay, be profoundly immoral. That is statement what this revolves around. In other words, “Evangelicals have believed the Bible, which I believe is profoundly immoral in regards to how it views homosexuality.” In another thread, Boonton mentioned that he believed himself to be an above average guy who is right about 54% of the essay global warming, time. Thesis For Building A Computer! I agree that he is mastering paragraph essay both intelligent and probably right more than he is wrong. So, why should I trade the Bible that is 100% right for genius that is right only for building, 60% or so? The Bible is 100% accurate, is it? May I ask – which version?

To name just a handful of the modern translations, there is the King James Version, the New King James Version, the meta, Revised Standard Version, the New International Version, and the New American Standard Version. When we look back further through history, translations which are presumably closer to the original, we find, among others, the Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus and the Old Latin Vulgate. Obviously these are just a scant few of the thesis, more well known versions, and there are many, many more. Bar Barbri Essay! And here’s the point – they all say different things. In most cases, the differences seem hugely insignificant, but the more distantly related the versions are, the more differences become apparent. They cannot ALL be correct.

So if you have miraculous insight into which particular version is THE authoratative version of the Bible (since they cannot all be true), then please do enlighten us. Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt kill. It is worth noting here that any system of statement, statements containing a contradiction may be used to prove any conclusion, no matter how absurd. That contradiction, taken from bar barbri, a couple Biblical passages, holes your claim to infallibility below the thesis, waterline. So, why should I trade the Bible that is 100% right for genius that is right only 60% or so? Every time religion has ostracized entire groups of change global warming, people it has been wrong.

Think of the Reformation, or assigning to Jews the collective guilt of deicide. Your position really boils down to thesis statement a computer, “on account of because.” You sidestep Euthyphros with a transparent dodge, and fail to so much as take on essay change warming, board the theodicy problem. Yet you (and, I presume, all) Evangelicals seek to impose a sectarian beliefs upon a form of secular contract. That is ironic enough. The irony meter goes into a computer the red, though, on noting that there is no barrier whatsoever to other sects performing sacred marriage upon whomever they choose. So, in the realm where Evangelicals really should have to meta, justify themselves with something more than “on account of because” they don’t. A Computer! And, in the realm where Biblical inerrancy should make dissension on this matter non existent, it doesn’t. Within ten years, people are going to look back on bar barbri mee review testing, the passage of Prop 8 with this one question: what the heck were they thinking?

Richie asks what is “THE authoritative version . . .? Good question! THE answer is the Authorized Version, which is the only version without a copyright. Thesis! It has been said, you can’t copywrite the Word of God. The two ms. Essay Change Warming! that you mentioned (Sinaticus and statement a computer Vaticanus), not only messages research, disagreed between themselves, but with 95% of the extant Greek ms. in statement existence. How To Write Meta! They formed the basis of most of the modern translations. (Even the infamous “New World Translation” used the Wescott-Hort Greek). Of these two ms., one was found in a trash can and the other in the Vatican Library. Both were of highly questionable value, besides their presumed antiquity.

There is no such thing as a perfect translation, but the for building a computer, Greek ms. upon which the English translation is made is essential to its accuracy. Check out “The Revision Revised” by bar barbri essay, John Burgon. for an eye opener. Richie asks, what is THE authoritative version . . .?” The answer is thesis a computer THE Authorised Version. Since the beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in any culture, at any time. But according to Skipper, in 10 years time everyone will asking “what the heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? qwertyuio – I have to say it’s nice to be given a straight answer.

However, things are not really so simple. For example, you cannot simply discount Sinaticus and Vaticanus simply because they disagree with most of the Greek manuscripts. Warming! Imagine for for building, a moment there is mastering paragraph essay a book (Book 1). Thesis For Building! I make two copies of that book (Books 2 and 3), but in one copy (Book 3)I accidentally make an error. University Of Chicago Essay Prompts 2013! If the flawed copy is then taken and copied, then the new copy (Book 4) will also contain that flaw. For Building! Simply put, if Book 3 is taken and copied hundreds of times while Books 1 and messages paper 2 are not, then those two books will end up disagreeing with the vast majority of texts, but that is thesis a computer obviously not good grounds to dismiss them. When we look at the earliest Greek manuscripts of the write meta, New Testament, the first problem is statement for building a computer of course, that we do not have the originals for mastering the 5 paragraph essay pdf, any of the New Testament books. The earliest copiest we have for thesis for building, the books date from between roughly 100 and how to 300 AD, and a computer exist mostly in fragments.

The Codex Vaticanus is the earliest of the great parchment manuscripts at 300 AD. Now also consider that in this time there was no printing press, so everything had to be copied by hand in a time and society were very few were literate at writing a thesis essay, all. This explains why the earliest manuscripts vary the most. The Authorized Version was written in the 17th century using existing English translations, but comparing them to the ancient Greek texts. Thesis Statement A Computer! It is therefore hugely important WHICH Greek texts they used, since they vary so much. How To Meta! How do we know they selected the right ones, if indeed, the ‘right ones’ have even survived? But all this history aside, interesting as it is, even the statement a computer, Authorized version contains contradictions.

To pull one at random, how did Judas Iscariot die? According to Matthew 27:3-8, he gave his silver to the priests, who used it to buy the Field of Blood – called so because they buried foreigners there, and then hanged himself. How To Write! According to Acts 1:18-19, Judas himself bought the field and thesis for building ‘fell headlong’ onto it so his guts burst out (nice), and this gave the field its name. How can the 100% accurate word of bar barbri essay, God contain such a blatant contradiction? Since the beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in any culture, at any time.

But according to Skipper, in 10 years time everyone will asking “what the heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? Yep. Both demographics and thesis statement for building a computer people’s experience point in that direction. Younger people increasingly accept the obvious, that homos-xuality is innate, not chosen. Also, familiarity has failed to breed contempt. As gays have come out of the closet, everyone else increasingly sees them as people, rather than contemptible perverts. So, I think it not only inevitable, but sooner rather than later that society will look at Prop 8 as a bloody minded denial of a minority by a majority for whom the cost would have been nil. All based upon nothing more than “on account of mastering, Because.” What would have been your reaction in thesis for building a computer 1998 if someone was to insist that in a thesis essay 2008, a black man with the last name Obama would be elected president?

A thread on same sex marriage is not the place to go into too much detail on for building, this matter. But I will say this and leave it to rest. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you are sincere in wanting to know more, I suggest that you google Wilber Pickering from the Greek department of Dallas Theological Seminary (Try Pickering + KJV),or (David Fuller + KJV),or John Burgon + KJV). Do some research! The Authorized Version was written using Greek, (NOT English)texts as a base.

It was in agreement with no less than 95% of the 5000 existing Greek ms. These copies and fragments do not vary much and how to meta one could reconstruct the entire NT (except for a few verses) just by statement a computer, personal corresponsense letters of the church fathers. On the other hand the essay testing, Sinaticus and a computer Vaticanus deviate over 3000 times from the “Majority Text” and leave out 200 verses found in the Authorized version. They were horrible texts and were not used, or replicated, for the very reason that they were horrible. Concerning the alledged contradiction of global, Judas’ death as described in the book of Matthew and thesis statement for building a computer Acts. Matthew says he hanged himself. Luke says that he fell headlong into subliminal research a field and his guts burst out. In order for thesis statement, the latter to happen, he must have fallen from a distance, which logically could have occured when he hung himself.

He botched everything else in essay life, why not his own death? Why “headlong”? No one knows, perhaps he got caught up in the branches of the tree that he hung himself on. I believe the Word of God. When 90% can be proven true, I can accept the other 10% on statement for building a computer, faith. That is my last word on this subject. . . qwertyu7, you are right that this is a little off-topic, but I had to answer the how to write meta, accusations against thesis statement for building a computer me.

I have indeed done some research. My understanding of the English origins of the Auhorized version comes from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02141a.htm. Be that as it may, your understanding of the Biblical scholarship is obviously lacking. Our earliest fragments of the books that make up the Bible differ hugely. It was only with the messages paper, invention of the printing press that any book could be reliably reproduced. Thesis! The Sinaticus and Vaticanus are not freak versions which deviate thousands of times – ALL early Bible manuscripts differ; sometimes significantly, though mostly not. There is no consensus or “majority text”. For a fuller explaination, see Bart Erhman’s Misquoting Jesus, or http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vJluEnIqTVk. Finally, what is the 90% of the Bible that can be proven true? None of it can be.

You are taking the university prompts, Bible ENTIRELY on faith as being even 90% true. For more on the historical inaccuracies in the Bible, see http://www.ebonmusings.org/atheism/otarch.html. I do see we are going off on a tangent though. I just had to speak out at the accusations that I had failed to research these matters, or that the Bible can be proved to be in the slightest bit accurate. 1. No accusations were made against statement for building you. 2. You are right The total number of departures of “the Sinaticus and Vaticanus are not freak versions that deviate thousands of times.” To be more precise these versions deviate over 36,000 times from the Majority Text.

3.The majority of the 5000 Greek ms. How To Write Meta! are in agreement. That is thesis why the Majority Text is also called the 2013, “Received Text.” It is essentially what was recieved by the early church fathers. 4.You say that “there is no consensus, or Majority Text.” If you google “Majority Text” you will find 86,000,000 references. 5.You say that “none” of the Bible can be proven true. B.J. Thesis For Building! Chesterton one of the world’s formost Mideast archeologists said that he has never found one thing in of chicago 2013 his archeological research that has ever contradicted a New Testiment statement. And he was a Jew! 5. You express doubt that the Bible is the thesis for building a computer, “slightest bit accurate.” The year is 2008 . . . since when? If I do not respond to your reply it is because. I am undergoing a family crisis, and besides, I don’t want to hijack this thread. 1. Perhaps I spoke a little strongly there.

I meant no offence. 2, 3 #038; 4. I stand totally corrected. There IS a “majority text”. You learn something new every day. However, according to the first site I visited, ‘The “Majority Text” is a statistical construct that does not correspond exactly to any known manuscript. Writing Statement For A Essay! It is arrived at by comparing all known manuscripts with one another and thesis statement for building a computer deriving from them the readings that are more numerous than any others.’ In other words, no single manuscript actually fits this ‘majority text’. It has been formed by looking at all the Bibe versions and fragments, (all of which disagree in one place or another) and in each case, favouring the most numerous interpretation. However, as I think I demonstrated in comment 98, the most numerous account is not necessarily the most accurate.

If I make two copies of a book and one copy contains a mistake, but the flawed copy simply goes on to be copied more times, then this will be the most numerous version, and subliminal research paper therefore the one to appear in thesis statement for building a computer the Majority Text. The Majority Text is doubtless an interesting focal point in Biblical scholarship, but there is no reason to suppose that this is more reliable or accurate than any other version. 5. ‘Not finding anything to contradict’ is not the same as proving. It’s like asking someone to prove a negative. If I said Oliver Twist was true and I could find no evidence in London to contradict this claim, that is a far cry from saying I have proved it to be true. Indeed the most convincing argument against the inerrancy of the Bible is the lack of evidence that we would expect to find if it was all true. for good examples of mastering the 5 pdf, this. 6. Thesis! ‘2008 years since the birth of Jesus’, is the answer you are obviously fishing for. However, the BC/AD dating system was not invented until 525 AD, and messages paper was only slowly adopted in the West between the 8th and for building 14th centuries.

The entire dating system was drawn up by men who were deeply Christian, and how to meta centuries after Jesus supposedly lived. This obviously cannot constitute strong evidence for thesis for building a computer, Jesus’ existence or Biblical accuracy. As a final point, I am sincerely sorry if you are having any personal troubles. I hope it is all sorted out soon. I won’t take it badly at all if you don’t respond. But I’m always happy to debate it you do. Actually, a study done a couple of years ago found that whether or not couples were in a legal commitment was the factor in staying together, rather than sexual orientation. Unmarried same sex couples did not (if I remember correctly) break up at a greater rate than unmarried heterosexual couples. And frankly, if heterosexual couples don’t need any incentive to stay monogamous without a marriage, well, why do they bother marrying?

It sounds to of chicago essay prompts 2013, me as if you’ve just argued that people can be just as committed living together as they are married. I only agree with like 2-things in here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I only agree with like 2-things in here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I agree with you that there are other considerations about this issue than biblical ones. You mentioned some cultural ones, there are judicial /legal ones as well. (Is this right actually in the Calif constitution, despite what the Supreme Court says?) This is not a Christian issue.

It’s about democratic majority rule, what rights are given to the minority and how to properly protect those rights. See my blog, “Life in the Big Democracy” at http://www.sophiesladder.com. P.S. I found this blog from a link on a computer, “Blue Christian”. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why.

2.how will this going to benefit the society….instead this will ruin the society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the doors to any body getting married, for the 5 essay, example would you want your dog to get married to another dog of the same sex…..how is the dog going to be benefited?? 4.why is there this change. …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to benefit the world….they can go out and watch movies or hand out together… 5.this is less meaningful to the society. 6.there is a need of a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of babies, then who will produces more babies or the orphanage would not want to give the baby to a gay couple…will they??

7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation… 8. gay marriage is not supported by religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and a female parent. 10.this will change the statement, foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is what i think of gay marriage, and now i have been given my debate topic to be for gay marraige and i don’t even agree to change global, one of the advantages of gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why. 2.how will this going to thesis for building, benefit the society….instead this will ruin the society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the messages, doors to any body getting married, for example would you want your dog to get married to another dog of the same sex…..how is the dog going to be benefited?? 4.why is there this change. …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to benefit the world….they can go out and watch movies or hand out together… 5.this is less meaningful to the society. 6.there is a need of a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of babies, then who will produces more babies or the orphanage would not want to give the statement a computer, baby to paper, a gay couple…will they?? 7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation…

8. gay marriage is not supported by religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and thesis statement for building a female parent. 10.this will change the foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is what i think of gay marriage, and now i have been given my debate topic to be FOR gay marraige and i don’t even agree to paper, one of the advantages of gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… Don’t let this important debate die. Thesis Statement! Everyone who’s posted here has raised some very good points, and they should be preserved for anyone in the future who needs to subliminal messages paper, learn the arguments on both sides. The best place to do that is at http://www.livingvote.org/. ‘Christians’ appear graceless, judgmental and controlling when they vote to thesis statement a computer, ‘defend marriage’.

The statistics offered by Steeve were an utter joke. Mr Hollis’ rebuttal was very impressive.

Write My Essay Online for Cheap -
Thesis Statement For Building A …

An Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe#x27;s Annabel Lee Essay. In life, as in death, Edgar Allan Poe evoked a feeling of sympathy from his. readership. Those who knew him well considered him deep, mysterious and. contemplative; thus, coupled with the thesis statement, copious tragedies he suffered. throughout his life, especially the loss of his first wife Virginia, it is. easy to understand how the author brings out the theme of Annabel Lee through. personal/setting imagery, repetition of words and rhythm/rhyme. Annabel Lee. honors the memory of Poe's deceased wife, Virginia. Throughout the poem, his. use of personal imagery helps the reader to grasp the intense feelings of. Bar Barbri Essay Mee Review Testing! loss he continues to experience long after her passing. The setting imagery. of to somewhat ease his pain was to put it into words; as such, Annabel Lee. became the statement a computer, expression of mastering the 5 paragraph his very soul. Its rhyme and rhythm encompassed a. great many emotions, feelings, and desires that ranged from one spectrum to. the other.

Personal imagery helped to represent the thesis statement for building a computer, author's rage, love, happiness, sorrow and despair, while the repetition of words served as an. avenue for the author to release the inner struggles that could not be set. Essay Testing! free through any other means than verse. Truly, Annabel Lee was a catharsis. to Poe's ailing heart. Almost without exception, all of Poe's literary works. have a theme - Annabel Lee is no different in this manner. Without a theme,

the poet would have no primary objective for the poem. One way to ascertain. the theme is to question what the author was trying to relate to the reader. By doing so, the answer may appear as obvious as the a computer, words that comprise the. piece; yet others may escape immediate recognition, which would require. further contemplation as to what the author is truly attempting to warming express. Thesis Statement A Computer! A relevant phrase in poetry that relates to the overall concept of essay testing theme is. that of the statement for building a computer, human condition, which refers -- quite logically -- to the. definition of being human. Analyzing Poe's poem, one finds that the human. condition is a regular consideration, in that humanity is subliminal messages paper, constantly in. question: Is Man strong or weak, good or evil, redeemed or condemned, Literary Analysis of Annabel Lee by Edgar Allan Poe Essay. Analyzing of Annabel Lee by Edgar Allan Poe Edgar Allan Poe in this poem “Annabel Lee” written in 1849, and first published shortly after his death in Sartain’s Union Magazine, is a story of statement for building a computer true love and great loss where a man loves a woman so deeply and is devastated when she dies but holds on to that love even after death. No one really knows whom exactly Poe wrote this poem about, whether or not it was actually inspired by someone he truly loved due to his death right after he wrote it. There Edgar Allen Poe#x27;s Annabel Lee Essay example. Warming! In the last lines of the thesis statement for building a computer, first stanza Poe states that Annabel Lee has no other thought than to love and be loved by me which continues to write meta show the similarities of the classic fairy tale love story. A Computer! The second stanza embellishes the fact that Annabel Lee is meta, a young woman by thesis statement a computer stating She is a child.

Poe also clarifies his age by university prompts 2013 saying and I was a child, which Essay about Annabel Lee, Edgar Allan Poe. story writers and statement for building poets in history. His writing could be viewed as eerie and disturbing, but one thing is certain, he definitely stood out with his distinct style. One author wrote: The enigma of Poe's survival clearly is explained by his universality … I published a review ¬essay that emphasized both Poe's hysterical badness and his inescapability… Letters poured in, many questioning my motives, and at least two radio programs accommodated outraged lovers of Poe, some of them quite passionate at denouncing Loss As Expressed in Edgar Allen Poe’s Annabel Lee Essay examples. For example, end rhymes in the poem alternate lines with very few variations, implementing frequently repeated, and alarmingly simplistic rhyming words such as: Lee, sea, me, and we. Furthermore, Poe's two breaks in bar barbri testing, the alternating rhyme scheme signify two important emotions typical of this late stage of his life. The first couplet (older than we far wiser than we) is bitterly mocking in tone, showing undeniable resentment towards “his distinguished foes and oppressors” (Regan, 1967) An Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe#x27;s Psychological Thriller Essay. unfortunately it was not enough to sustain his family financially. Mrs. Clemms and Poe's wife Virginia nearly starved to death one winter. Thesis Statement A Computer! After his wife's death in 1847 Poe became increasingly unstable and his dependence on tempted suicide in 1848 and tragically died in university prompts 2013, 1849, five days after being found in a delirious and semi-conscious condition in Baltimore.

2. A Computer! Allan Poe's Works and Literary Achievement Edgar Allan Poe was mostly known for his poems and short tales and his literary criticism. Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe#x27;s Writing Style Essay. A virtuoso of suspense and horror, Edgar Allan Poe is known for his Gothic writing style. University Of Chicago Prompts 2013! His style is created through his use of punctuation, sentence structure, word choice, tone, and figurative language. For Building A Computer! Punctuation-wise; dashes, exclamation marks, semicolons, and commas are a favorite of subliminal research Poe. His sentences vary greatly; their structures are influenced by punctuation. Much of his word choice set the tone of his works. Figurative language colors his writings with description. Such is observed in Analysis of Edgar Allan Poe#x27;s The Raven Essay. only true infatuation and has undoubtedly found that, contrary to the old adage, it is not better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all. The “rare and thesis radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore” (95)- in fact a type and shadow of Poe’s own young bride, who at the time of this poem’s publication was suffering from fatal attack of tuberculosis- was no longer at his side, and a thesis comparative essay our story-teller wonders if, however impossibly, he would ever clasp her to thesis statement a computer himself again.

At the mastering the 5 essay pdf, bird’s Essay about Edgar Allen Poe’s Annabel Lee: Never a Happily Ever After. /Chilling and killing my Annabel Lee.” By making the for building a computer, wind slaughter Annabel Lee like a serial killer, the speaker shows that Annabel Lee dies and he places the blame on something that will always be and can never be stopped by messages research paper any science or living being. Also within stanza four, Poe uses consonance to emphasize the death of Annabel Lee and statement a computer how their fairy tale love story came to an abrupt ending. “That the meta, wind came out of the cloud by night,/Chilling and killing my Annabel Lee.” By emphasizing the An Analysis of the First Two Stanzas of Edgar Allan Poe#x27;s The Raven. Thesis For Building! chamber door. You can almost hear the tapping on the door of the library as you continue reading. And at the end of each stanza, nothing more or nevermore is writing a thesis for a comparative essay, like the a computer, door slamming of the library. Of Chicago! One of the genius factors of Poe's writing is his way of working his way into the human psyche, with nothing more than a few words and a perfect setting. Thesis Statement A Computer! You can not really relate to some one, who is being chased by the 5 paragraph essay pdf a monster, because even though it is scary, somewhere in the back supposed to be very holy changed their ways and are jealous of their love.

In the thesis statement a computer, next stanza when Poe writes the line “a wind blew out of a cloud, chilling my beautiful Annabel Lee,” (line 15-16) is essay, when a great shift of tone and imagery in the poem happens. Poe does this to express his feeling of the death of Annabel lee and to also show how much he loved her. He goes on for building, to say “so that her high born kinsman came and bore her away

Need Help Writing an Essay? -
Thesis Statement Creator - Ashford …

Child Respect For Parents Essays and Research Papers. Respect of statement a computer Parents Name: Shahira. M Subject: World. Religion Teacher: Sis. Husna Grade: 11 All religions . and all societies have given parents an honorable status. Meta! From a purely material viewpoint, we find ourselves indebted to our parents . They are the ones who teach us from statement a computer, how to stand on our tiny toes, to how to meta the ones who wipe our tears at night. No religion can bring the status down for our parents ; especially for our mothers. A Computer! Islam particularly has given parents the meta, highest. Family , Father , Islam 2104 Words | 5 Pages. Parent to Child, Child to a computer Parent Relationships. The University of Queensland 28/03/2013 EDUC 3701: Assessment Task 1 Essay: Parent to child , child to . Subliminal Paper! parent influences Author: Nicole Castledine (s42590480) Tutor: Gregory Vass Introduction Students who are gifted and a computer, talented are recognized as those with an innate ability in a thesis, any domain that places them within the top 10% of their age peers (Collins, 2011; Gifted and Talented Children, 2013).

What constitutes giftedness varies in cultures and society, however gifts. Educational psychology , Genius , Gifted education 1959 Words | 5 Pages. How to respect your parents ? There are many days set aside in thesis statement for building a computer, non-Islamic societies to honour and appreciate special people; . examples of these are Father's Day, Mother's Day, Memorial Day and Labour Day. In Islam, however, respecting, honouring and appreciating parents is not just for a single day of the year, but rather for each and essay climate change global, every day. Parents in thesis statement for building, the Quran: A Muslim child should respect and appreciate his or her parents on a daily basis.

Allaah mentions that human beings must recognise. Allah , Hadith , Islam 895 Words | 3 Pages. building self-esteem as well a mutual respect . It is extremely important for parents to be able to communicate clearly and . efficiently with their children. An open and effective communication line between parents and their children, benefits not only the children, but every member of the write meta, family. Relationships between parents and thesis, their children are notably improved when there is productive communication taking place. Basically, if communication between parents and their children is how to satisfying, then. Communication , Developmental psychology , Graphic communication 2272 Words | 7 Pages. Today in America parents are exhausting their skills to a computer discipline their children who have difficult behavior problems.

Coping with these . situations sometimes results in parents who are overwhelmed and unable to manage their children’s behavior or control their own reactions. Inherited discipline techniques from the previous generation, such as spanking can lead to frustrated parents who lacking skills and knowledge, and in some instances child abuse. As a result of mee review testing a combination of environment. Concerted cultivation , Developmental psychology , Nurturant parent model 1642 Words | 5 Pages. Child Abuse When one thinks of child abuse, the initial thought is a child with broken bones and bruises. . Physical abuse is not the only type of child abuse.

Child abuse can be in the form of neglect, emotional and sexual abuse as well as the most obvious, physical abuse. Thesis A Computer! These four types of testing abuse can leave lasting scars on the children and cause a repeat pattern of abuse in later years. A Computer! Child abuse covers a wide range of writing statement comparative essay parental and adult actions inflicted upon children and statement a computer, many times are not. Abuse , Bullying , Child abuse 1381 Words | 4 Pages. Successful Parent-Child Relationships. My only memories as a child were that of the time I spent at a Chinese Restaurant our family owned for 22 years. Since it was a family owned . and operated business, I had to be there every day 365 days a year and like any child , I never understood why. All I thought about is why I had to be stuck at a boring restaurant while my friends enjoyed their days after school playing and having fun which left me feeling resentment. Bar Barbri Essay Mee Review Testing! After feeling resentment towards my parents for years, those negative. Cannon , Daughter , Family 1027 Words | 3 Pages.

mother, father, brother, sister, husband, wife, son, daughter, and a small cadre of close friends (Robertson 1). Attachment is crucial to the . Thesis For Building A Computer! survival and development of the infant. Kenneth and essay, Klaus points out that the parents bond to their child may be the strongest of thesis all human ties. This relationship has two unique characteristics. First, before birth one individual infant gestates within a part of the mothers body and subliminal messages research, second, after birth she ensures his survival while he is.

Breastfeeding , Child development , Childbirth 1797 Words | 5 Pages. Observations of statement for building Parent-Child Interactions and Temperament. | Observations of Parent - Child Interactions and essay testing, Temperament Psychology 223 January 23, 2013 | . Statement For Building! Temperament is university essay prompts defined as the thesis a computer, features of how to your personality that are present at birth and have a genetic/biological basis. Your temperament, or basic disposition, interacts with environmental influences to statement for building a computer create your personality (Salters-Pedneault, 2010). Bar Barbri Essay Testing! Temperament is a behavioral style that shows the how of behavior, rather than the what or why. Temperamental differences. Childhood , Concerted cultivation , Mother 1562 Words | 5 Pages. ? Cultural Identity Essay Radhika Gogna 0757448 Parent Child Relations, ECS 2000 Mohamad Haniff Wednesday September 26, 2012 . Statement For Building! Parent Child Relations Essay This paper will briefly describe how Hinduism reflects my upbringings, as well as my abilities to communicate with multicultural parents , and writing, their children. This essay will entail the traditions and values that shape my identity, as well as my everyday life. Furthermore, my in depth detail of the struggles and hardships that immigrants. Culture , Family , Father 1180 Words | 6 Pages.

Cultural Influences on Parent-Child Relationships. Cultural Influences on Parent - Child Relationships The United States is the most diverse nation in the world with immigrants . from thesis statement for building, countries such as Mexico, China, Vietnam, Philippines, etc. The 5 Essay Pdf! Families from these different regions struggle with trying to balance their new American culture without losing touch with their homeland customs. A major obstacle is maintaining a healthy relationship between parents and thesis a computer, children-- especially adolescents. It is hard enough for parents and adolescents to be. Asian American , Family , Filipino American 1107 Words | 4 Pages.

9-17-2011 INDIVIDUAL PROJECT: CHILD AND PARENT OBSERVATION This observation took place on Saturday October 17th at Town . For A Comparative Essay! Center Corte Madera at approximately 2:00pm. Thesis For Building! The day was bright and sunny and the Mall was full of all kinds of parents and children. I choose a male child approximately 3 years old, wearing blue top and writing a thesis for a essay, black pants with sponge bob square pants sneakers. The mother was wearing a yoga outfit as most mothers in Marin seem to wear these days. She was in her mid-thirties. Dad. Boy , Childhood , Family 1173 Words | 3 Pages.

As a childminder I work towards EYFS and thesis for building a computer, meet Every Child Matters in everything I do. I would like children in my care achieve as much as they . can so I start the learning and development process from torough talk to of chicago prompts parents before child starts attending to my setting to find out child’s likes, dislikes, abilities, achievements. Then I do observe, asses particular child and plan activities following his interest, abilities, individual achievements, background. The important part of my observation. Child , The Child 1965 Words | 6 Pages. chose the statement, word respect for my definition essay, and asked my mom what I should write about, she started singing an Aretha Franklin song, which . I have heard, but I do not know it that well, so I looked up the lyrics. (What you want Baby, I got What you need Do you know I got it? All I'm askin' Is for bar barbri essay mee review a little respect when you come home (just a little bit) Hey baby (just a little bit) when you get home (just a little bit) mister (just a little bit) Lyrics from the song, Respect by thesis statement for building, Aretha. 1990 singles , Aretha Franklin , Respect 867 Words | 2 Pages. Child Parent Conflict and Academic Performance. Child - Parent Conflict and Academic Performance Introduction Education and family plays a major role in the psychological . Statement! development of a child . Parent - child relationships are unique, but vary in complexity (Barber, 1994); however, the universal element among all relationships is for building conflict.

Child - parent conflict is defined as a struggle, or trial of strength between a child (defined in my research paper as an a thesis essay, individual under the age of 18) and statement for building, their guardian(s). University 2013! There are many different conflicts. Child abuse , Domestic violence , Family 2201 Words | 7 Pages. parents should be active in child life. youth and maturity. Parents can play an important role in helping their children use or strengthen behaviors, skills, attitudes, and statement a computer, motivation . that promote their physical and mental health and overall well-being in childhood, adolescence and well into their adulthood. As you grow up, you are taught many life lessons from your experienced parents . Your parents ' duty is to nurture you, so that you can grow up to messages research paper become a person who is strong and able to support oneself. Parents must grasp that when. Child , Childhood , Developmental psychology 793 Words | 3 Pages.

parental guidance turns to statement for building a computer Parent Abuse INTRODUCTION Everyone is aware of child abuse; however, not everyone has a full . understanding of the child abuse laws. Climate Global Warming! In today’s society parents take a less active role in child rearing, be it due to overwork, stress, or simply the statement a computer, fact they just don’t care or have given up. The children today have a sever lack of respect for adults, and this is largely due to the lack of parental guidance, or lack of research paper understanding the child abuse laws. THESIS STATEMENT . Abuse , Child abuse , Domestic violence 911 Words | 3 Pages. Respect Respect is to statement for building a computer show regard or consideration towards someone or something. It can be defined as a positive feeling of . Bar Barbri Testing! appreciation towards a person or thing.

Respect expresses the regard and for building a computer, consideration shown by an individual towards others. Respect cannot be demanded, it is an asset that has to be earned. From childhood we are taught to respect our parents , elders, teachers and subliminal, the list goes on. There is a personal form of respect , which is well known as self- respect . If an thesis statement, individual. Feeling , Human behavior , Individual 1262 Words | 3 Pages. Respect Essay I am very lucky to live in Canada, where this beautiful country has not been shattered by destruction of the land and essay testing, . towns, but rather provides protection from it, and delivers respectful education, freedom, and statement for building, safety so that we don’t need to write meta live a decided life, or a life of fear. What is “respectful education”? Well, you could say that it is education that teaches children not only curriculum, but also how to be respectful to everyone and everything around them, you may. Creator deity , Democracy , Dictatorship 883 Words | 3 Pages. Respect Respect is a definition that has many meanings and thesis for building a computer, aspects to writing statement comparative essay it. But what meanings that means the thesis for building, most to me is . family, yourself and your peers.

Respect comes with trust, obedience and integrity. Those meanings all together have not only mastering the 5 pdf, a personal meaning but also a reflection on statement for building a computer, me and to subliminal research paper others as well. Here’s an explanation of thesis statement a computer how all these meanings come together to define the word respect . First off, family is the most important part of life. If you don’t learn respect from. Core issues in ethics , Family , Gain 1014 Words | 3 Pages. ?What Does It Take to writing statement for a comparative essay be Good Parents ? Good morning ladies and gentlemen. I am Chong Cia Ling, the founder of Brainy Montessori. I am so . grateful to have such an honour standing here to deliver my speech entitled “What does it take to be good parents ?”. I am sure all the thesis statement for building, parents here will agree with me that being parents is tough. Bringing up children is a very difficult task.

Everyone wishes to global warming be good parents . However, sometimes we could be so discouraged and helpless when we get the feedback. Childhood , Corporal punishment , Corporal punishment in for building, the home 2624 Words | 6 Pages. successful parent -teacher partnerships Kevin J. Swick Building successful parent -teacher partnerships Kevin J. Swick Atlanta, . Ga.: Humanics, 1979, 81 p.; 28 cm. The problems in the school life can be solved if teachers and subliminal messages research, parents work together as a team. “The traditional concept of involving parents in the process of educating their children has typically been restricted to one-way communication approaches. Either the parent is talking at the teacher or the teacher is thesis for building talking to the parent . Essay Prompts 2013! Yet. Concentration , Developmental psychology , Education 712 Words | 3 Pages. Discipline is the structure that helps the child fit into statement a computer the real world happily and effectively. It is the essay mee review testing, foundation for the development of . the child’s own self-discipline. Effective and positive discipline is thesis a computer about teaching and essay climate global warming, guiding children, not just forcing them to obey. As with all other interventions aimed at pointing out thesis a computer, unacceptable behavior, the child should always know that the parent loves and supports him or her. Trust between parent and child should be maintained and constantly built.

Andre the the 5 paragraph pdf, Giant Has a Posse , Child discipline , Consistency 1031 Words | 3 Pages. ? Inspector Calls Revision Notes Draw a spider diagram/bullet points for each key character Birling Controlling Mrs Birling . Demands respect Eric A drunk Sheila Gerald Inspector Open-minded Very rich Manipulative Consider the: Chain of events ACT 1 The play is set in 1912. It takes place in the opulent dining. An Inspector Calls , Working class 1540 Words | 5 Pages. parent partnership AT HOME AWAY FROM HOME IT IS OUR PLEDGE TO WORK HAND IN HAND WITH PARENTS TO ENSURE EVERY CHILD . GETS THE BEST POSSIBLE START IN LIFE. WE BELIEVE THAT PARENTS SHOULD BE AT THE HEART OF ALL DECISIONS ABOUT SERVICES AND CARE FOR THEIR CHILDREN, THEREFORE WE PROMISE TO LISTEN, COMMUNICATE, GUIDE AND EXPLAIN ALL SERVICES WHICH CHILDREN TAKE PART IN. INSURING EACH CHILD ACHIEVES THEIR FULL POTENTIAL THROUGH EXCELLENT COMMUNICATION AND PARENT PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN HOME AWAY FROM HOME. Caregiver , Child , Data Protection Act 1998 1259 Words | 4 Pages. Working with parents does not have to be contentious, communication is the key. Communication is critical for building a strong and excellent . working relationship between parents and the school.

As a teacher I begin the school year by sending out a questionnaire about each child that I ask the parents to fill out so that I may get to know the child better. Along with contact information some questions asked are: “What are your child’s interests? What would you like me to know about your child ? What are. Education , High school , Individualized Education Program 950 Words | 3 Pages. Sole parents - Legal and social definitions of group- Legal- person who cares for one or more children without assistance from another . Thesis A Computer! parent or carer living in the same home. Social- A parent that raisers a child by themselves, supporting them financially and emotionally. Characteristics- One Parent living together with one or more children According to ABS, 19.3 % of meta children live in statement for building, a sole parent family A female runs 91% of statement essay sole parent families sole parents may be permanent. Childhood , Community , Divorce 853 Words | 4 Pages. communication, trust and respect are both very important factors in both The Veldt and statement, Penny in the Dust.

However, they are both viewed . differently by write, each family and both families turned out completely different. That is thesis statement for building a computer why I think the two stories we read are the of chicago prompts, perfect examples of how communication, trust and respect influences how a family functions. Respect is another huge issue for thesis statement for building the parents and kids in The Veldt. Subliminal Messages Paper! One instance of this would be the kids louring their parents into a trap and eventually. Attachment parenting , Attachment theory , Attachment therapy 2158 Words | 6 Pages. What Should Parents Tell Their Seriously Ill Child. What Should Parents Tell Their Seriously Ill Child ? Having a seriously ill child in a family is one of the most . emotionally and psychologically draining experiences any parents can go through.

The emotional needs of the child are of utmost importance, and the impact on family members can be very tasking. It is advisable that family members explore all support groups available, which can include family, friends, and social workers to help them cope with the life changing process of caring for for building a computer a. Cognition , Death , Fear 1051 Words | 3 Pages. help that is university essay prompts needed to the child /family as soon as possible without confusing the thesis for building a computer, child or their families. Prompts! And as a pre-school . setting it is good to know that you are not on your own if any concerns should arise about a child in statement, the setting and that specialist help is available to all the the 5 essay, children and young people if required. 1.2 Identify who relevant partners would be in own work setting * Social worker * Health visitor * Teacher * Parents * Police * Careers.

Child , Childhood , Need 831 Words | 3 Pages. Analyse the Ethos of Partnership with Parents. Analyse The Ethos Of Partnership with Parents , ( linking to key changes in statement for building a computer, law and government reforms). Paper! The relationship between . parent and practitioner or the service that they are working within is crucial to the effective outcome for all those concerned. It now seems impossible in modern Britain to imagine developing any kind of relationship with a child without taking into account the wider family and the impact it has on thesis statement for building, that child . Essay Mee Review! Given that this is the case it is essential to statement a computer understand. Child , Childhood , Children Act 1989 1236 Words | 4 Pages. It is very important for each one of us to learn to paragraph respect others. We cannot retain knowledge, if we do not . respect our Parents , Teachers, and elders. A Computer! Respect for mastering the 5 others is expressed in statement for building a computer, many different ways like bowing down to elders, taking good care of our books, paying attention in class; listening to essay prompts 2013 our parents , being polite to everybody which results in good manners and good behaviour. Statement For Building! Respect destroys the ego and pride, brings forth good thinking, results in the use.

Bowing , Grammatical person , Human behavior 1022 Words | 3 Pages. 2013 The Ideal Parent : Brightening a Childs Future Parenting is a big part of every ones lives; it makes up who you are as a . person and in many cases projects who you will be in research, the future. Some adults have trouble manipulating their children and teaching them what is right from wrong, while others have a much easier time doing so. In my opinion there is statement a computer no such thing as “the perfect parent ”, both the mother and the father have their flaws, but what matters is subliminal messages research paper that the parent is always there for. Adolescence , Family , Father 1459 Words | 4 Pages. Respect Vs Disrespect By Osita Onyebuchi Respect vs.

Disrespect Have you ever met someone who was rude to thesis statement for building a computer you and bar barbri, didn't . hold you with much regard? How did you feel? Did you feel angry? What do you think respect is? How is thesis statement respect earned? Respect is an university of chicago essay prompts 2013, important way of being kind and good to other people.

We live in a society that respect is thesis statement a computer earned not given. Bar Barbri Essay Mee Review! With respect there is also an opposite side of disrespect. The definition of respect is to consider worthy of high regard. There are. Bowing , Core issues in ethics , Faith 1242 Words | 3 Pages. Respect Being responsible for thesis statement what you do will earn you the respect you deserve, also doing what is right and not running your . mouth demonstrate a lot of respect , “Being brilliant is mastering the 5 paragraph pdf no great feat if you respect nothing”. (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe) Every military in this world has some sort of chain of command in which respect is the statement for building a computer, main premise behind the university prompts, entire Idea of organization and with a chain of statement command. Meta! Respect is important in the design of the military system itself. You have.

Corporal , Non-commissioned officer , Officer 1517 Words | 4 Pages. How Do Parents Influence Child Development. How do parents influence child development? Parents play a significant role in a computer, influencing their child’s . development. Were you ever curious why you act the way you do? Why did you turn out the way you did? There are many factors that affect a child’s development. Paper! One being the attachment the child received during infancy, whether the child had a secure or unsecured bond with their parent . Statement A Computer! The second element is the types of parenting styles used while the child was developing. There are three components. Attachment parenting , Attachment theory , Child development 1686 Words | 5 Pages.

have, and few want to give. Respect gives a positive feeling of esteem or deference for testing a person or other entity (such as a nation or a . religion), and also specific actions and conduct representative of that esteem. Respect can be a specific feeling of regard for the actual qualities of the thesis for building a computer, one respected. Writing A Thesis Statement Comparative Essay! From that fact, the researcher wanted to show the for building a computer, audience how to being a respected person and give respect to other people, environment and nation. In this world, respect has great importance in.

Personal life , Research , Respect 735 Words | 3 Pages. Respect Respect , especially in the Army is a very important value to live by. It is much more than just talking kindly and subliminal messages research paper, . listening to someone, it is the for building a computer, process of messages taking into consideration someone’s emotions, feelings and needs. You must also focus on their ideas, thoughts, and preferences. It is showing someone that you value their time; that you care what they have to say. Showing someone respect allows that person to know and acknowledge that you comprehend and believe in what they are.

Military , Non-commissioned officer , People 2857 Words | 7 Pages. life. Value is what: We are appreciated Is important for us We are respect everyone We believe We care about thesis for building, humans . University Of Chicago! Children are like adults. We watch and analyse what is good and bad behaviour. A Computer! As a child doesn’t have knowledge of what is good or bad they are copying whatever they see or witness in any environment they live.

So it is comparative essay not just parents or any childcare workers responsibility how the child is behaving. Statement For Building A Computer! It’s everything what is around them. They are learning how to value. Child , Childhood , Children 1290 Words | 4 Pages. Parents are not always right.

Parents , are humans. Mastering! Humans, make mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes. However, most . parents THINK they're always right. Because they think that they are older and more knowledgeable, (which is true) they will never make mistakes. However, it is because that they think that they're older and more knowledgeable they make the mistakes. Often, they do not admit their mistakes or they make up excuses like I'm testing you. There are a handful of parents in this authoratative. Child , Divorce , Father 1070 Words | 3 Pages. May. 5 EYMP1 Context and principles for Early Years Provision – parents as partners Context and principles for Early Years Provision – . parents as partners 3.1 Explain the partnership model of thesis for building a computer working with carers.

The early care and education of babies, toddlers and young children is bar barbri mee review shared among parents , families and practitioners. A partnership approach between these people is very important, especially at statement for building a computer times of change in children’s lives. University! These times might include settling into a new. Child , Childhood , Communication 1077 Words | 4 Pages. Parenting Styles and Excessively Permissive Parent. Nowadays parents are too permissive to their children, or Different Parenting Approaches In GENERAL parents play a great . role in theIR children? LIVES. I believe that parents should be very careful about the for building a computer, behavior of a thesis statement for a essay their children. They should tend to control the activities of children and should not let them to do the activities THAT can give bad results or influence badly ON them.

But nowadays parents are too permissive to their children. Is it good or bad for the children? I will explain. Childhood , Concerted cultivation , Parenting 1429 Words | 4 Pages. “ Respect for Life” Taking the responsibility of becoming a parent comes with many emotionally and morally challenging . decisions of thesis right and essay warming, wrong. Mr. and Mrs. Ayala have been faced with one of the toughest moral dilemma's that parents could be confronted with. Their only statement for building, daughter who is twenty has recently been diagnosed with a rare form of blood cancer known as leukemia. The chances of of chicago essay prompts recovery are extremely slim without a rare bone marrow transplantation from statement, a close blood match. The. Conservatism , Doctor , Doctor Who 1725 Words | 5 Pages.

Influence of Celebrities vs. Essay Mee Review! Parents. ? Influence of Celebrities vs. Parents In today’s culture we can easily influence each other in thesis, our society because of the university of chicago essay prompts 2013, . advance in knowledge and media. Celebrities and Parents play significant parts in influencing people.

Discussing the similarities and differences of the influence from celebrities and influence of parents , it’s clear that they share similarities in choices of lifestyle, effectiveness through imitation, and qualities of influence. They contrast each other in that. Adolescence , Anxiety , Celebrity 1146 Words | 3 Pages. Topic: The effects of single parent homes vs. both parents on child academic. Milne, Ann M., et al. Single . Parents , Working Mothers, and the Educational Achievement of for building a computer School Children. Change Warming! Sociology of Education 59.3 (1986): 125-39.

ProQuest. 12 Oct. 2013. The researchers did a research on the effects of mother's employment and thesis, living in paragraph pdf, a one- parent family on children's achievement. According to Herzong and Sudia they argued that there is thesis statement for building a computer no difference in school achievement between children from. Education , Family , Father 1756 Words | 5 Pages.

Civics Writing Assignment on Respect By: Tamara Dipchand For: Mrs. Parker 1) The definition of respect in my point of testing view . is admiring a person or thing for their abilities, personalities and accomplishments by for building a computer, being kind and generous and also obeying an important figure's rules. Of Chicago Prompts! 2) Being respectful is very important to me because it allows me to statement a computer live my life in a very enjoyable and positive way. Being kind and generous to people is one of the ways I respect others. Of Chicago Essay Prompts! I think that is thesis for building a very.

Canada , Global warming , Human behavior 901 Words | 3 Pages. Use of Text Messaging in Parent and Child Relationships. Use of Texting in Parent and the 5 essay, Child Relationships Starting in the late 1980s, The European public telephone network and the . European Community and European Telecommunications Standards Institute developed the GSM, which is most similar to what we call “cell phones” today. This phone drastically changed the communications world with the ability to statement for building place international calls, send SMS texts, and even had luxuries like caller ID and climate change, voicemail, which we all take for granted now. Thesis A Computer! This phone started a. Cellular network , Communication , Family 1207 Words | 3 Pages. ?HOW TO PARENT TEENAGERS? All behavior, whether it be that of children, adolescents or adults is influenced by write, the way they think. We all . have values, viewpoints and morals that shape our thinking. It is hard to change the way we act, if the way we think about our behavior doesn’t change. As parents of adolescents we often wonder “What were they thinking?!” when we hear about the kinds of choices that they have made.

In many families this is likely to be a fleeting question uttered in frustration. By the Way , Childhood , Developmental psychology 2196 Words | 6 Pages. disrespect ones parents , teachers and elder with little to no punishment for one’s behavior. Furthermore, young adolescent has the ascendancy . to believe that they can neglect their parents after the age of thesis for building a computer 18. Not taking into change consideration that their parents are the thesis for building, ones who provided supported, and cared for them for all 18 years. Westerns easily forget the sacrifices that their parents have made for them. Mee Review! They forget to such an extent where they believe that putting their parents in thesis, nursing homes.

Family , Father , ILOVEYOU 1552 Words | 4 Pages. Forms of Discipline: What is best for the child ? Children are like flowers, if well taken care of they will bloom. If ignored or tortured, . they will wither and die. Child discipline is one of the most important elements of successful parenting. Today, many people have this notion that physical abuse is in no way a solution to helping children discern between right and wrong.

Since generations children have been taught the art of the 5 paragraph pdf discipline through physical punishment. Often this approach to disciplining. Caning , Child discipline , Corporal punishment 2495 Words | 6 Pages. aren’t always effective, rational, or socially just (Argosy, 2013). An important social problem at thesis statement for building a computer hand is of chicago prompts child welfare. “The protection of thesis for building a computer . children from harm by their families and the provision of safe havens for children who are maltreated in essay climate change global, their home environment are the twin goals of child welfare policy” (Jimenez, 2013). Thesis Statement A Computer! Child welfare policies were formulated to the 5 paragraph pdf end problems of child abuse, maltreatment, or neglect by enforcing certain expectations and requirements of the safety of all children. Abuse , Adoption , Child abuse 1257 Words | 4 Pages. Child Abuse Research Paper Most parents and other caregivers do not intend to hurt their children, but . abuse is defined by thesis statement for building a computer, the effect on subliminal messages research, the child , not the motivation of the parents or caregiver.Tens of thousands of children each year are traumatized by physical, sexual, and emotional abusers or by statement for building a computer, caregivers who neglect them.Child abuse as common as it is shocking. Most of us can’t imagine what would make an adult use violence against a child , and write meta, the worse the thesis statement a computer, behavior. Abuse , Child abuse , Domestic violence 1257 Words | 4 Pages. respect is notlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- . Of Chicago Essay Prompts! lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll anythingllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll- llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll-.

Billy Ray Cyrus , Hannah Montana: The Movie , La Di Da Di 608 Words | 3 Pages. Title: Parent - Child Relationship and Academic Performance of Students in for building a computer, Core Gateway College CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM AND ITS . BACKGROUND Introduction Development of a student is not as simple as others think it is. His life among his peers and among members of his family undergo several stages. His relationship is the basis for his achievement or failure in university prompts 2013, his education and thesis, his development. Adolescence has always been a critical period for every individual. This “problem age”. Grade , High school 2934 Words | 11 Pages.

(SATS). This supports children and their families as it is a free service. They help children fit in through providing home visits. To discuss each . individual child’s progress parents are invited each term to a parents evening. In addition they have further facilities provided such as coffee mornings giving a chance for parents to build an understanding. Voluntary sectors are based on donations from the a thesis statement comparative, community. Barnados’s is thesis statement a computer a worldwide charity based in the UK which supports and subliminal messages paper, reassures families. Age appropriate , Child , Childhood 1467 Words | 5 Pages. Running head: CHILD CARE Which way is the best to care for your baby? Yeji Yoon University at Buffalo ESL 408B Beth Seilberger April . 9, 2010 Outline I. Thesis Statement: Parental nurturing is best choice for children.

A. Introduction(Facts) 1. Past- Mothers usually stayed at thesis a computer home 2. Today-Ratio of stay-at-home mothers decreased a. A Thesis Statement Essay! Financial problems b. Build their own careers (traditional gender roles have changed) 3. Statement For Building A Computer! Policies for working mothers a. Policies . Attachment theory , Babysitting , Child care 2455 Words | 7 Pages. Culture and Child Rearing Practices The purpose of this paper is to express the different ways culture affects child -rearing . practices. Culture and for a comparative, child rearing are both essential in child development. Culture and ethnicity can have a deciding effect on the child -rearing techniques that families implement throughout the world. Thesis Statement For Building! Differences such as methods of discipline, expectations regarding acceptance of responsibilities and transmission of religious instruction will vary among families. The. Childhood , Culture , Developmental psychology 1739 Words | 5 Pages.

Child Behavior As It Ages Michael Larson English Composition II Ensley Laruth 10/30/2012 Child Behavior As It Ages Many . people have studied the effect of university 2013 academic achievement and later career success. Statement A Computer! The focus of how to this paper will be on the work of Greg Duncan of Northwestern University and L Rowell Huesmann of the for building a computer, University of Michigan. These findings can help parents , teachers and messages research, behavioral scientists help disruptive students. Thesis Statement For Building! The study shows that the way children act at a young age will. Attention , Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder , Hyperactivity 1584 Words | 5 Pages. calm. Do not raise your voice or be to animated in mee review, your actions. Try to use your negotiation skills to statement a computer calm the situation and stay rational at subliminal messages research all times. . Resolve through negotiation or discussion. For Building! Do not be drawn into having a disagreement with a child . Do not discuss anything with them until you have both had time out TDA23-4.1 Identify relevant legal requirements and procedures covering confidentiality, data protection and the disclosure of information.

Refer to: TDA22-1.1 Identify the. Child , Childhood , Conflict 766 Words | 3 Pages. Child Care/ Communicate with Adults. approach a parent / adult is to keep calm at all times also to subliminal messages respect them like they should respect you. As a carer . for thesis for building a computer their children you should always agree with their opinions even if they are not right but they are entitle to their say in things. If you do not understand an adult/ parent you should apologize and ask them to essay climate repeat themselves. Also never make a value of judgement about statement for building a computer, a child or a family but you need to always respect a person’s culture and identity. When talking to a parent or adult.

Adult , Childcare , Confidentiality 1545 Words | 4 Pages.